Knowledge · Alibaba Cloud

Qwen3 1.5B on MMLU-Pro: score, rank and what it means

Qwen3 1.5B scores 60.8 on MMLU-Pro, placing it #516 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 73.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 91.6.

Score
60.8
0–100 scale
Rank
#516
of 600
Percentile
14th
within the index
Benchmark avg
73.5
all models
Leader
91.6
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
30.8
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MMLU-Pro, with Qwen3 1.5B highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 91.6
GPT-5.1 Max 91.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 91.2
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 90.7
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 90.1
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 90.0
GPT-5.2 89.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 89.5
GPT-5.2 Vision 89.5
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.5

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
4 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
5 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
6 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
7 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
9 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4
10 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9

What this score means

On MMLU-Pro, Qwen3 1.5B sits at #516 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 91.6, so the gap to the top is 30.8 points. The median model in this index scores 76.1, which puts Qwen3 1.5B below the midpoint.

Alibaba Cloud models average 75.9 on this benchmark. Qwen3 1.5B is 15.1 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Alibaba Cloud model.

Among small open-weight models, the average is 59.8. Qwen3 1.5B is 1.0 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 60.8 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $0.84 per million input tokens, Qwen3 1.5B is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMLU-Pro. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Seed-OSS 7B ByteDance 8192 $0.85 55.5
GLM-4.6 1.5B Zhipu AI 4096 $0.92 54.7
Gemma 3 7B Google DeepMind 32768 $0.90 55.9
Llama 3 Anyscale 8B Anyscale 32768 $0.97 57.3
Qwen3 1.5B Alibaba Cloud 4096 $0.84 53.5
DBRX 7B Databricks 8192 $0.65 51.9
DeepSeek-R1 1.5B DeepSeek 16384 $1.04 56.6

Other benchmarks for Qwen3 1.5B

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
GPQA Diamond 49.8 527 12th
SWE-bench Verified 36.9 542 10th
HumanEval 59.8 507 16th
MATH-500 54.2 526 12th
AIME 2025 41.5 533 11th
LiveCodeBench 38.8 544 9th
IFEval 64.5 536 11th
TruthfulQA 60.9 520 13th
HellaSwag 69.1 547 9th
MMMU 52.1 530 12th
Arena Elo 1238.1 517 14th

FAQ

What score does Qwen3 1.5B get on MMLU-Pro?

Qwen3 1.5B scores 60.8 on MMLU-Pro in this index. The benchmark average is 73.5 and the top score is 91.6.

How does Qwen3 1.5B rank on MMLU-Pro?

It ranks #516 of 600 models, in the 14th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 91.6.

Is Qwen3 1.5B good at MMLU-Pro?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MMLU-Pro score calculated?

MMLU-Pro is a knowledge benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Qwen3 1.5B cost?

Qwen3 1.5B costs $0.84 per million input tokens and $4.53 per million output tokens.

Related