Mathematics · Alibaba Cloud

Qwen3 Chat on AIME 2025: score, rank and what it means

Qwen3 Chat scores 73.8 on AIME 2025, placing it #190 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Score
73.8
0–100 scale
Rank
#190
of 600
Percentile
68th
within the index
Benchmark avg
63.6
all models
Leader
91.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro
Gap to leader
17.6
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on AIME 2025, with Qwen3 Chat highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 91.4
GPT-5.2 Pro 91.0
GPT-5.1 Pro 90.6
GPT-5.2 90.6
o4 Reasoning 90.3
o4 Pro 89.9
Claude Opus 4.5 89.8
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 89.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 88.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
2 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
5 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
6 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
8 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2

What this score means

On AIME 2025, Qwen3 Chat sits at #190 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Pro, scores 91.4, so the gap to the top is 17.6 points. The median model in this index scores 67.6, which puts Qwen3 Chat above the midpoint.

Alibaba Cloud models average 66.9 on this benchmark. Qwen3 Chat is 6.9 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Alibaba Cloud model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 73.9. Qwen3 Chat is 0.1 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 73.8 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $4.75 per million input tokens, Qwen3 Chat is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on AIME 2025. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Reka Flash Reasoning Reka AI 32768 $10.70 75.6
Sonar Perplexity 200000 $10.57 76.0
Sonar Pro Turbo Perplexity 128000 $13.55 79.0
DeepSeek-R1 Base DeepSeek 400000 $5.05 80.1
Qwen3 Chat Alibaba Cloud 128000 $4.75 79.1
ERNIE 4.0 Baidu 32768 $11.37 76.7
Magistral Chat Mistral AI 128000 $4.33 76.8

Other benchmarks for Qwen3 Chat

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 83.4 98 84th
GPQA Diamond 73.9 173 71th
SWE-bench Verified 68.5 133 78th
HumanEval 83.9 136 77th
MATH-500 81.4 180 70th
LiveCodeBench 72.2 144 76th
IFEval 87.5 118 80th
TruthfulQA 81.3 145 76th
HellaSwag 86.5 194 68th
MMMU 77.3 110 82th
Arena Elo 1417.2 160 73th

FAQ

What score does Qwen3 Chat get on AIME 2025?

Qwen3 Chat scores 73.8 on AIME 2025 in this index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the top score is 91.4.

How does Qwen3 Chat rank on AIME 2025?

It ranks #190 of 600 models, in the 68th percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Is Qwen3 Chat good at AIME 2025?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the AIME 2025 score calculated?

AIME 2025 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Qwen3 Chat cost?

Qwen3 Chat costs $4.75 per million input tokens and $17.42 per million output tokens.

Related