Commonsense · Alibaba Cloud

Qwen3 Instruct on HellaSwag: score, rank and what it means

Qwen3 Instruct scores 87.0 on HellaSwag, placing it #179 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 81.4 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.1.

Score
87.0
0–100 scale
Rank
#179
of 600
Percentile
70th
within the index
Benchmark avg
81.4
all models
Leader
96.1
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
9.1
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on HellaSwag, with Qwen3 Instruct highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 96.1
GPT-5.2 Turbo 95.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 95.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 95.2
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 95.2
Grok 4 Reasoning 95.2
GPT-5.2 Vision 94.6
Gemini 3 Pro Turbo 94.6
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 94.4
o4 Pro 94.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
3 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
4 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
6 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
7 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4
8 Gemini 3 Pro Turbo Google DeepMind 400000 $19.62 86.4
9 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
10 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3

What this score means

On HellaSwag, Qwen3 Instruct sits at #179 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 96.1, so the gap to the top is 9.1 points. The median model in this index scores 83.6, which puts Qwen3 Instruct above the midpoint.

Alibaba Cloud models average 83.1 on this benchmark. Qwen3 Instruct is 3.9 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Alibaba Cloud model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 86.8. Qwen3 Instruct is 0.2 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 87.0 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $5.06 per million input tokens, Qwen3 Instruct is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HellaSwag. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Reka Core Reka AI 32768 $12.17 77.4
ERNIE 4.0 Turbo Baidu 65536 $12.00 78.0
ERNIE 4.5 Turbo Baidu 128000 $13.75 79.7
Llama 3 Lambda Instruct Lambda 32768 $3.92 75.8
Qwen3 Instruct Alibaba Cloud 1000000 $5.06 79.8
Command A Turbo Cohere 32768 $13.53 79.8
Hunyuan-Large Chat Tencent 200000 $4.35 78.1

Other benchmarks for Qwen3 Instruct

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 80.3 177 71th
GPQA Diamond 74.1 166 72th
SWE-bench Verified 68.5 134 78th
HumanEval 85.1 112 81th
MATH-500 86.1 91 85th
AIME 2025 78.5 108 82th
LiveCodeBench 71.1 171 72th
IFEval 89.1 79 87th
TruthfulQA 79.7 196 67th
MMMU 78.7 80 87th
Arena Elo 1419.2 153 75th

FAQ

What score does Qwen3 Instruct get on HellaSwag?

Qwen3 Instruct scores 87.0 on HellaSwag in this index. The benchmark average is 81.4 and the top score is 96.1.

How does Qwen3 Instruct rank on HellaSwag?

It ranks #179 of 600 models, in the 70th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.1.

Is Qwen3 Instruct good at HellaSwag?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the HellaSwag score calculated?

HellaSwag is a commonsense benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Qwen3 Instruct cost?

Qwen3 Instruct costs $5.06 per million input tokens and $25.39 per million output tokens.

Related