Coding · Alibaba Cloud

Qwen3-Max Nano on LiveCodeBench: score, rank and what it means

Qwen3-Max Nano scores 62.5 on LiveCodeBench, placing it #343 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 61.0 and the leader is Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning at 85.1.

Score
62.5
0–100 scale
Rank
#343
of 600
Percentile
43th
within the index
Benchmark avg
61.0
all models
Leader
85.1
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning
Gap to leader
22.6
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on LiveCodeBench, with Qwen3-Max Nano highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.1
Grok 4 Reasoning 85.1
Claude Opus 4.5 85.0
GPT-5.2 Max 84.8
Grok 4 Turbo 84.7
GPT-5.1 Turbo 84.6
GPT-5.2 Pro 84.6
GPT-5.2 Reasoning 84.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 84.1
Gemini 3 Pro Max 83.6

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
2 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
4 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
5 Grok 4 Turbo xAI 1000000 $19.21 86.7
6 GPT-5.1 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.19 86.1
7 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
8 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
10 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9

What this score means

On LiveCodeBench, Qwen3-Max Nano sits at #343 of 600. The leader, Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning, scores 85.1, so the gap to the top is 22.6 points. The median model in this index scores 64.7, which puts Qwen3-Max Nano below the midpoint.

Alibaba Cloud models average 64.0 on this benchmark. Qwen3-Max Nano is 1.5 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Alibaba Cloud model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 58.3. Qwen3-Max Nano is 4.2 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 62.5 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $8.31 per million input tokens, Qwen3-Max Nano is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on LiveCodeBench. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Yi-Large Chat 01.AI 65536 $3.49 73.5
Phi-3.5 Chat Microsoft 16384 $2.64 69.0
Llama 3 Hyperbolic Base Hyperbolic 32768 $3.02 71.1
Mixtral Mistral AI 65536 $3.48 73.7
Qwen3-Max Nano Alibaba Cloud 65536 $8.31 71.7
Command R+ Base Cohere 65536 $3.24 71.6
Gemma 3 Base Google DeepMind 65536 $3.09 71.1

Other benchmarks for Qwen3-Max Nano

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 76.0 308 49th
GPQA Diamond 65.0 361 40th
SWE-bench Verified 59.2 339 44th
HumanEval 74.7 349 42th
MATH-500 75.6 313 48th
AIME 2025 69.1 280 53th
IFEval 79.3 346 42th
TruthfulQA 76.8 287 52th
HellaSwag 81.9 352 41th
MMMU 68.5 336 44th
Arena Elo 1348.2 368 39th

FAQ

What score does Qwen3-Max Nano get on LiveCodeBench?

Qwen3-Max Nano scores 62.5 on LiveCodeBench in this index. The benchmark average is 61.0 and the top score is 85.1.

How does Qwen3-Max Nano rank on LiveCodeBench?

It ranks #343 of 600 models, in the 43rd percentile. The leader is Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning at 85.1.

Is Qwen3-Max Nano good at LiveCodeBench?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the LiveCodeBench score calculated?

LiveCodeBench is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Qwen3-Max Nano cost?

Qwen3-Max Nano costs $8.31 per million input tokens and $42.90 per million output tokens.

Related