Knowledge · Alibaba Cloud

Qwen3-Max Reasoning on MMLU-Pro: score, rank and what it means

Qwen3-Max Reasoning scores 88.1 on MMLU-Pro, placing it #15 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 73.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 91.6.

Score
88.1
0–100 scale
Rank
#15
of 600
Percentile
98th
within the index
Benchmark avg
73.5
all models
Leader
91.6
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
3.5
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MMLU-Pro, with Qwen3-Max Reasoning highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 91.6
GPT-5.1 Max 91.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 91.2
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 90.7
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 90.1
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 90.0
GPT-5.2 89.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 89.5
GPT-5.2 Vision 89.5
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.5

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
4 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
5 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
6 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
7 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
9 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4
10 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9

What this score means

On MMLU-Pro, Qwen3-Max Reasoning sits at #15 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 91.6, so the gap to the top is 3.5 points. The median model in this index scores 76.1, which puts Qwen3-Max Reasoning above the midpoint.

Alibaba Cloud models average 75.9 on this benchmark. Qwen3-Max Reasoning is 12.2 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Alibaba Cloud model.

Among frontier models, the average is 86.9. Qwen3-Max Reasoning is 1.2 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 88.1 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $18.12 per million input tokens, Qwen3-Max Reasoning is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMLU-Pro. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Qwen3-Max Pro Alibaba Cloud 400000 $18.87 86.2
Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
Gemini 3 Pro Google DeepMind 2000000 $18.24 86.1
Gemini 3 Pro Pro Google DeepMind 200000 $19.80 87.3
Qwen3-Max Reasoning Alibaba Cloud 2000000 $18.12 85.9
o4 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.34 86.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $17.84 86.0

Other benchmarks for Qwen3-Max Reasoning

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
GPQA Diamond 79.8 61 90th
SWE-bench Verified 75.3 37 94th
HumanEval 92.6 14 98th
MATH-500 93.0 11 98th
AIME 2025 83.1 54 91th
LiveCodeBench 78.0 64 89th
IFEval 92.2 36 94th
TruthfulQA 88.8 15 98th
HellaSwag 91.5 48 92th
MMMU 82.3 29 95th
Arena Elo 1461.0 51 92th

FAQ

What score does Qwen3-Max Reasoning get on MMLU-Pro?

Qwen3-Max Reasoning scores 88.1 on MMLU-Pro in this index. The benchmark average is 73.5 and the top score is 91.6.

How does Qwen3-Max Reasoning rank on MMLU-Pro?

It ranks #15 of 600 models, in the 98th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 91.6.

Is Qwen3-Max Reasoning good at MMLU-Pro?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MMLU-Pro score calculated?

MMLU-Pro is a knowledge benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Qwen3-Max Reasoning cost?

Qwen3-Max Reasoning costs $18.12 per million input tokens and $81.94 per million output tokens.

Related