Commonsense · Alibaba Cloud

Qwen3 on HellaSwag: score, rank and what it means

Qwen3 scores 88.1 on HellaSwag, placing it #139 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 81.4 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.1.

Score
88.1
0–100 scale
Rank
#139
of 600
Percentile
77th
within the index
Benchmark avg
81.4
all models
Leader
96.1
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
8.0
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on HellaSwag, with Qwen3 highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 96.1
GPT-5.2 Turbo 95.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 95.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 95.2
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 95.2
Grok 4 Reasoning 95.2
GPT-5.2 Vision 94.6
Gemini 3 Pro Turbo 94.6
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 94.4
o4 Pro 94.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
3 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
4 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
6 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
7 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4
8 Gemini 3 Pro Turbo Google DeepMind 400000 $19.62 86.4
9 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
10 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3

What this score means

On HellaSwag, Qwen3 sits at #139 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 96.1, so the gap to the top is 8.0 points. The median model in this index scores 83.6, which puts Qwen3 above the midpoint.

Alibaba Cloud models average 83.1 on this benchmark. Qwen3 is 5.0 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Alibaba Cloud model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 86.8. Qwen3 is 1.3 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 88.1 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $5.04 per million input tokens, Qwen3 is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HellaSwag. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI 128000 $5.41 81.7
Claude Haiku 4.5 Turbo Anthropic 200000 $14.37 80.0
DeepSeek-Coder Chat DeepSeek 200000 $4.20 77.3
GLM-4.5 Chat Zhipu AI 65536 $4.53 78.3
Qwen3 Alibaba Cloud 128000 $5.04 80.3
ERNIE 4.5 Reasoning Baidu 1000000 $14.36 79.8
QwQ Alibaba Cloud 128000 $4.57 78.6

Other benchmarks for Qwen3

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 81.2 143 76th
GPQA Diamond 77.7 94 84th
SWE-bench Verified 71.6 83 86th
HumanEval 87.0 89 85th
MATH-500 86.5 85 86th
AIME 2025 74.5 166 72th
LiveCodeBench 73.8 114 81th
IFEval 85.6 170 72th
TruthfulQA 80.4 168 72th
MMMU 76.7 119 80th
Arena Elo 1420.9 145 76th

FAQ

What score does Qwen3 get on HellaSwag?

Qwen3 scores 88.1 on HellaSwag in this index. The benchmark average is 81.4 and the top score is 96.1.

How does Qwen3 rank on HellaSwag?

It ranks #139 of 600 models, in the 77th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.1.

Is Qwen3 good at HellaSwag?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the HellaSwag score calculated?

HellaSwag is a commonsense benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Qwen3 cost?

Qwen3 costs $5.04 per million input tokens and $22.52 per million output tokens.

Related