Safety · Alibaba Cloud

QwQ 1.5B on TruthfulQA: score, rank and what it means

QwQ 1.5B scores 57.3 on TruthfulQA, placing it #551 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 73.6 and the leader is GPT-5.1 Max at 91.1.

Score
57.3
0–100 scale
Rank
#551
of 600
Percentile
8th
within the index
Benchmark avg
73.6
all models
Leader
91.1
GPT-5.1 Max
Gap to leader
33.8
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on TruthfulQA, with QwQ 1.5B highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.1 Max 91.1
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 90.3
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 90.0
GPT-5.2 Pro 90.0
GPT-5.2 89.7
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 89.4
Qwen3-Max Max 89.3
GPT-5.1 89.2
GPT-5.1 Turbo 89.2

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
2 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
3 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
4 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
5 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
6 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
7 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
8 Qwen3-Max Max Alibaba Cloud 400000 $18.53 85.9
9 GPT-5.1 OpenAI 2000000 $19.01 86.0
10 GPT-5.1 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.19 86.1

What this score means

On TruthfulQA, QwQ 1.5B sits at #551 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.1 Max, scores 91.1, so the gap to the top is 33.8 points. The median model in this index scores 76.3, which puts QwQ 1.5B below the midpoint.

Alibaba Cloud models average 76.0 on this benchmark. QwQ 1.5B is 18.7 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Alibaba Cloud model.

Among small open-weight models, the average is 59.9. QwQ 1.5B is 2.6 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 57.3 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $0.61 per million input tokens, QwQ 1.5B is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on TruthfulQA. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Arctic 7B Snowflake 8192 $0.49 50.3
MiniMax-Text 1.5B MiniMax 32768 $0.58 51.5
Kimi K1.5 1.5B Moonshot AI 4096 $0.75 53.2
DeepSeek-Coder 1.5B DeepSeek 16384 $0.58 51.0
QwQ 1.5B Alibaba Cloud 32768 $0.61 51.6
Llama 3 Baseten 1.5B Baseten 4096 $0.42 48.2
Command R+ 1.5B Cohere 32768 $0.51 50.0

Other benchmarks for QwQ 1.5B

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 57.5 555 8th
GPQA Diamond 47.3 545 9th
SWE-bench Verified 35.0 557 7th
HumanEval 53.1 554 8th
MATH-500 50.8 549 9th
AIME 2025 39.9 541 10th
LiveCodeBench 42.5 523 13th
IFEval 63.1 546 9th
HellaSwag 69.5 541 10th
MMMU 51.7 536 11th
Arena Elo 1211.8 542 10th

FAQ

What score does QwQ 1.5B get on TruthfulQA?

QwQ 1.5B scores 57.3 on TruthfulQA in this index. The benchmark average is 73.6 and the top score is 91.1.

How does QwQ 1.5B rank on TruthfulQA?

It ranks #551 of 600 models, in the 8th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.1 Max at 91.1.

Is QwQ 1.5B good at TruthfulQA?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the TruthfulQA score calculated?

TruthfulQA is a safety benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does QwQ 1.5B cost?

QwQ 1.5B costs $0.61 per million input tokens and $3.19 per million output tokens.

Related