Mathematics · Alibaba Cloud

QwQ 8B on AIME 2025: score, rank and what it means

QwQ 8B scores 47.0 on AIME 2025, placing it #477 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Score
47.0
0–100 scale
Rank
#477
of 600
Percentile
21th
within the index
Benchmark avg
63.6
all models
Leader
91.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro
Gap to leader
44.4
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on AIME 2025, with QwQ 8B highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 91.4
GPT-5.2 Pro 91.0
GPT-5.1 Pro 90.6
GPT-5.2 90.6
o4 Reasoning 90.3
o4 Pro 89.9
Claude Opus 4.5 89.8
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 89.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 88.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
2 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
5 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
6 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
8 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2

What this score means

On AIME 2025, QwQ 8B sits at #477 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Pro, scores 91.4, so the gap to the top is 44.4 points. The median model in this index scores 67.6, which puts QwQ 8B below the midpoint.

Alibaba Cloud models average 66.9 on this benchmark. QwQ 8B is 19.9 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Alibaba Cloud model.

Among small open-weight models, the average is 41.6. QwQ 8B is 5.4 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 47.0 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $1.37 per million input tokens, QwQ 8B is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on AIME 2025. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Mistral Small 3 8B Mistral AI 8192 $0.99 57.2
Mistral Small 3 7B Mistral AI 4096 $0.89 55.2
Llama 3.1 Cerebras 8B Cerebras 32768 $1.02 58.2
Llama 3 Hyperbolic 8B Hyperbolic 16384 $0.92 56.0
QwQ 8B Alibaba Cloud 16384 $1.37 59.5
Llama 3 Anyscale 8B Anyscale 32768 $0.97 57.3
Llama 3 Novita 8B Novita AI 16384 $0.99 55.5

Other benchmarks for QwQ 8B

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 64.6 460 23th
GPQA Diamond 55.7 454 24th
SWE-bench Verified 47.3 443 26th
HumanEval 64.2 451 25th
MATH-500 60.4 456 24th
LiveCodeBench 49.0 456 24th
IFEval 71.3 436 27th
TruthfulQA 63.7 478 20th
HellaSwag 73.0 483 20th
MMMU 58.5 450 25th
Arena Elo 1287.7 434 28th

FAQ

What score does QwQ 8B get on AIME 2025?

QwQ 8B scores 47.0 on AIME 2025 in this index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the top score is 91.4.

How does QwQ 8B rank on AIME 2025?

It ranks #477 of 600 models, in the 21st percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Is QwQ 8B good at AIME 2025?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the AIME 2025 score calculated?

AIME 2025 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does QwQ 8B cost?

QwQ 8B costs $1.37 per million input tokens and $6.68 per million output tokens.

Related