Mathematics · Alibaba Cloud

QwQ Base on MATH-500: score, rank and what it means

QwQ Base scores 77.5 on MATH-500, placing it #266 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 72.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.7.

Score
77.5
0–100 scale
Rank
#266
of 600
Percentile
56th
within the index
Benchmark avg
72.5
all models
Leader
96.7
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
19.2
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MATH-500, with QwQ Base highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 96.7
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 95.9
GPT-5.1 Pro 95.1
o4 Reasoning 94.8
Grok 4 Max 94.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 94.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 94.2
Claude Opus 4.5 93.7
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 93.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo 93.2

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
5 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
6 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
9 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo Anthropic 2000000 $19.57 85.7

What this score means

On MATH-500, QwQ Base sits at #266 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 96.7, so the gap to the top is 19.2 points. The median model in this index scores 76.0, which puts QwQ Base above the midpoint.

Alibaba Cloud models average 76.4 on this benchmark. QwQ Base is 1.1 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Alibaba Cloud model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 81.3. QwQ Base is 3.8 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 77.5 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $3.68 per million input tokens, QwQ Base is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MATH-500. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Nemotron 4 NVIDIA 65536 $4.18 76.6
Llama 3 DeepInfra Instruct DeepInfra 65536 $3.84 75.5
Nova Lite Turbo Amazon 8192 $9.14 73.2
GLM-4.5 Base Zhipu AI 32768 $3.99 74.9
QwQ Base Alibaba Cloud 65536 $3.68 74.1
Codestral Base Mistral AI 8192 $3.31 73.1
Firefunction Max Fireworks AI 32768 $9.12 73.2

Other benchmarks for QwQ Base

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 77.5 263 56th
GPQA Diamond 69.9 268 55th
SWE-bench Verified 65.2 211 65th
HumanEval 77.0 308 49th
AIME 2025 66.2 326 46th
LiveCodeBench 64.0 319 47th
IFEval 81.2 303 50th
TruthfulQA 79.8 190 68th
HellaSwag 86.4 201 67th
MMMU 70.0 304 49th
Arena Elo 1373.8 300 50th

FAQ

What score does QwQ Base get on MATH-500?

QwQ Base scores 77.5 on MATH-500 in this index. The benchmark average is 72.5 and the top score is 96.7.

How does QwQ Base rank on MATH-500?

It ranks #266 of 600 models, in the 56th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.7.

Is QwQ Base good at MATH-500?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MATH-500 score calculated?

MATH-500 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does QwQ Base cost?

QwQ Base costs $3.68 per million input tokens and $15.98 per million output tokens.

Related