Multimodal · Alibaba Cloud

QwQ Base on MMMU: score, rank and what it means

QwQ Base scores 70.0 on MMMU, placing it #304 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Score
70.0
0–100 scale
Rank
#304
of 600
Percentile
49th
within the index
Benchmark avg
67.1
all models
Leader
86.9
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
16.9
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MMMU, with QwQ Base highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 86.9
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 86.2
GPT-5.2 85.3
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.1 Max 85.1
Grok 4 Pro 84.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 84.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro 84.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 84.4
GPT-5.2 Vision 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
5 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
6 Grok 4 Pro xAI 1000000 $19.00 85.4
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
8 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro Anthropic 1000000 $18.73 86.7
9 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
10 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4

What this score means

On MMMU, QwQ Base sits at #304 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 86.9, so the gap to the top is 16.9 points. The median model in this index scores 70.0, which puts QwQ Base below the midpoint.

Alibaba Cloud models average 69.4 on this benchmark. QwQ Base is 0.6 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Alibaba Cloud model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 74.3. QwQ Base is 4.3 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 70.0 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $3.68 per million input tokens, QwQ Base is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMMU. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Sonar Perplexity 200000 $10.57 76.0
Auto Turbo OpenRouter 65536 $7.96 70.9
Codestral Instruct Mistral AI 65536 $4.01 75.1
Llama 3 Lambda Instruct Lambda 32768 $3.92 75.8
QwQ Base Alibaba Cloud 65536 $3.68 74.1
Qwen3-Max Mini Alibaba Cloud 128000 $11.13 76.5
Reka Flash Max Reka AI 32768 $11.17 75.9

Other benchmarks for QwQ Base

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 77.5 263 56th
GPQA Diamond 69.9 268 55th
SWE-bench Verified 65.2 211 65th
HumanEval 77.0 308 49th
MATH-500 77.5 266 56th
AIME 2025 66.2 326 46th
LiveCodeBench 64.0 319 47th
IFEval 81.2 303 50th
TruthfulQA 79.8 190 68th
HellaSwag 86.4 201 67th
Arena Elo 1373.8 300 50th

FAQ

What score does QwQ Base get on MMMU?

QwQ Base scores 70.0 on MMMU in this index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the top score is 86.9.

How does QwQ Base rank on MMMU?

It ranks #304 of 600 models, in the 49th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Is QwQ Base good at MMMU?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MMMU score calculated?

MMMU is a multimodal benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does QwQ Base cost?

QwQ Base costs $3.68 per million input tokens and $15.98 per million output tokens.

Related