Knowledge · Alibaba Cloud

QwQ Chat on MMLU-Pro: score, rank and what it means

QwQ Chat scores 80.6 on MMLU-Pro, placing it #167 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 73.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 91.6.

Score
80.6
0–100 scale
Rank
#167
of 600
Percentile
72th
within the index
Benchmark avg
73.5
all models
Leader
91.6
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
11.0
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MMLU-Pro, with QwQ Chat highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 91.6
GPT-5.1 Max 91.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 91.2
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 90.7
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 90.1
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 90.0
GPT-5.2 89.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 89.5
GPT-5.2 Vision 89.5
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.5

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
4 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
5 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
6 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
7 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
9 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4
10 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9

What this score means

On MMLU-Pro, QwQ Chat sits at #167 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 91.6, so the gap to the top is 11.0 points. The median model in this index scores 76.1, which puts QwQ Chat above the midpoint.

Alibaba Cloud models average 75.9 on this benchmark. QwQ Chat is 4.7 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Alibaba Cloud model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 80.0. QwQ Chat is 0.6 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 80.6 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $4.28 per million input tokens, QwQ Chat is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMLU-Pro. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
GLM-4.6 Instruct Zhipu AI 1000000 $5.15 80.4
Hunyuan-Large Chat Tencent 200000 $4.35 78.1
Hunyuan-Turbo Tencent 128000 $10.55 75.8
Llama 3 Modal Instruct Modal 128000 $3.84 75.2
QwQ Chat Alibaba Cloud 65536 $4.28 78.2
ERNIE 4.0 Turbo Baidu 65536 $12.00 78.0
Llama 4 Maverick Chat Meta AI 128000 $5.09 79.7

Other benchmarks for QwQ Chat

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
GPQA Diamond 72.8 203 66th
SWE-bench Verified 68.3 139 77th
HumanEval 83.4 151 75th
MATH-500 82.1 166 72th
AIME 2025 76.1 140 77th
LiveCodeBench 68.8 213 65th
IFEval 85.2 186 69th
TruthfulQA 79.8 191 68th
HellaSwag 87.9 147 76th
MMMU 75.7 145 76th
Arena Elo 1414.1 173 71th

FAQ

What score does QwQ Chat get on MMLU-Pro?

QwQ Chat scores 80.6 on MMLU-Pro in this index. The benchmark average is 73.5 and the top score is 91.6.

How does QwQ Chat rank on MMLU-Pro?

It ranks #167 of 600 models, in the 72nd percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 91.6.

Is QwQ Chat good at MMLU-Pro?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MMLU-Pro score calculated?

MMLU-Pro is a knowledge benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does QwQ Chat cost?

QwQ Chat costs $4.28 per million input tokens and $16.00 per million output tokens.

Related