Multimodal · Alibaba Cloud

QwQ Instruct on MMMU: score, rank and what it means

QwQ Instruct scores 76.8 on MMMU, placing it #116 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Score
76.8
0–100 scale
Rank
#116
of 600
Percentile
81th
within the index
Benchmark avg
67.1
all models
Leader
86.9
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
10.1
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MMMU, with QwQ Instruct highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 86.9
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 86.2
GPT-5.2 85.3
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.1 Max 85.1
Grok 4 Pro 84.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 84.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro 84.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 84.4
GPT-5.2 Vision 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
5 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
6 Grok 4 Pro xAI 1000000 $19.00 85.4
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
8 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro Anthropic 1000000 $18.73 86.7
9 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
10 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4

What this score means

On MMMU, QwQ Instruct sits at #116 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 86.9, so the gap to the top is 10.1 points. The median model in this index scores 70.0, which puts QwQ Instruct above the midpoint.

Alibaba Cloud models average 69.4 on this benchmark. QwQ Instruct is 7.4 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Alibaba Cloud model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 74.3. QwQ Instruct is 2.5 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 76.8 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $4.62 per million input tokens, QwQ Instruct is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMMU. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Nova Pro Max Amazon 1000000 $14.05 81.2
Sonar Pro Max Perplexity 128000 $14.01 81.1
DeepSeek-R1 Chat DeepSeek 400000 $5.62 82.4
ERNIE 4.0 Turbo Baidu 65536 $12.00 78.0
QwQ Instruct Alibaba Cloud 65536 $4.62 79.0
Claude Haiku 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 128000 $15.11 81.4
DeepSeek-V3.2 Base DeepSeek 128000 $5.05 80.2

Other benchmarks for QwQ Instruct

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 79.8 189 69th
GPQA Diamond 73.5 187 69th
SWE-bench Verified 67.3 163 73th
HumanEval 81.2 210 65th
MATH-500 84.1 124 79th
AIME 2025 74.7 161 73th
LiveCodeBench 72.4 139 77th
IFEval 87.7 110 82th
TruthfulQA 82.8 113 81th
HellaSwag 88.4 128 79th
Arena Elo 1420.8 146 76th

FAQ

What score does QwQ Instruct get on MMMU?

QwQ Instruct scores 76.8 on MMMU in this index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the top score is 86.9.

How does QwQ Instruct rank on MMMU?

It ranks #116 of 600 models, in the 81st percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Is QwQ Instruct good at MMMU?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MMMU score calculated?

MMMU is a multimodal benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does QwQ Instruct cost?

QwQ Instruct costs $4.62 per million input tokens and $17.65 per million output tokens.

Related