Mathematics · Perplexity

Sonar Nano on AIME 2025: score, rank and what it means

Sonar Nano scores 50.6 on AIME 2025, placing it #456 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Score
50.6
0–100 scale
Rank
#456
of 600
Percentile
24th
within the index
Benchmark avg
63.6
all models
Leader
91.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro
Gap to leader
40.8
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on AIME 2025, with Sonar Nano highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 91.4
GPT-5.2 Pro 91.0
GPT-5.1 Pro 90.6
GPT-5.2 90.6
o4 Reasoning 90.3
o4 Pro 89.9
Claude Opus 4.5 89.8
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 89.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 88.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
2 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
5 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
6 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
8 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2

What this score means

On AIME 2025, Sonar Nano sits at #456 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Pro, scores 91.4, so the gap to the top is 40.8 points. The median model in this index scores 67.6, which puts Sonar Nano below the midpoint.

Perplexity models average 69.8 on this benchmark. Sonar Nano is 19.2 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Perplexity model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 60.1. Sonar Nano is 9.5 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 50.6 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $4.37 per million input tokens, Sonar Nano is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on AIME 2025. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Zephyr Base Hugging Face 4096 $1.26 59.5
Firesearch Mini Fireworks AI 32768 $3.94 61.5
Pythia Chat EleutherAI 4096 $1.31 59.1
Llama 3.3 Groq 8B Groq 16384 $1.17 59.5
Sonar Nano Perplexity 4096 $4.37 61.9
MiniMax-Text 8B MiniMax 4096 $1.22 59.5
Llama 4 Scout 8B Meta AI 8192 $1.46 61.2

Other benchmarks for Sonar Nano

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 65.8 439 27th
GPQA Diamond 57.4 434 28th
SWE-bench Verified 48.4 435 28th
HumanEval 63.7 453 25th
MATH-500 66.7 411 32th
LiveCodeBench 55.1 404 33th
IFEval 70.7 446 26th
TruthfulQA 68.5 409 32th
HellaSwag 75.1 441 27th
MMMU 59.2 438 27th
Arena Elo 1303.0 413 31th

FAQ

What score does Sonar Nano get on AIME 2025?

Sonar Nano scores 50.6 on AIME 2025 in this index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the top score is 91.4.

How does Sonar Nano rank on AIME 2025?

It ranks #456 of 600 models, in the 24th percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Is Sonar Nano good at AIME 2025?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the AIME 2025 score calculated?

AIME 2025 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Sonar Nano cost?

Sonar Nano costs $4.37 per million input tokens and $16.96 per million output tokens.

Related