Coding · Perplexity

Sonar Nano on LiveCodeBench: score, rank and what it means

Sonar Nano scores 55.1 on LiveCodeBench, placing it #404 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 61.0 and the leader is Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning at 85.1.

Score
55.1
0–100 scale
Rank
#404
of 600
Percentile
33th
within the index
Benchmark avg
61.0
all models
Leader
85.1
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning
Gap to leader
30.0
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on LiveCodeBench, with Sonar Nano highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.1
Grok 4 Reasoning 85.1
Claude Opus 4.5 85.0
GPT-5.2 Max 84.8
Grok 4 Turbo 84.7
GPT-5.1 Turbo 84.6
GPT-5.2 Pro 84.6
GPT-5.2 Reasoning 84.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 84.1
Gemini 3 Pro Max 83.6

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
2 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
4 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
5 Grok 4 Turbo xAI 1000000 $19.21 86.7
6 GPT-5.1 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.19 86.1
7 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
8 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
10 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9

What this score means

On LiveCodeBench, Sonar Nano sits at #404 of 600. The leader, Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning, scores 85.1, so the gap to the top is 30.0 points. The median model in this index scores 64.7, which puts Sonar Nano below the midpoint.

Perplexity models average 68.2 on this benchmark. Sonar Nano is 13.1 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Perplexity model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 58.3. Sonar Nano is 3.2 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 55.1 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $4.37 per million input tokens, Sonar Nano is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on LiveCodeBench. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
ERNIE 4.5 Nano Baidu 32768 $6.01 65.6
Phi-3.5 Base Microsoft 65536 $2.24 66.6
StableLM 2 Stability AI 8192 $1.91 65.0
Sonar Mini Perplexity 65536 $6.52 67.9
Sonar Nano Perplexity 4096 $4.37 61.9
Embed 4 Turbo Cohere 4096 $5.13 64.0
Kimi K2 8B Moonshot AI 8192 $1.86 64.7

Other benchmarks for Sonar Nano

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 65.8 439 27th
GPQA Diamond 57.4 434 28th
SWE-bench Verified 48.4 435 28th
HumanEval 63.7 453 25th
MATH-500 66.7 411 32th
AIME 2025 50.6 456 24th
IFEval 70.7 446 26th
TruthfulQA 68.5 409 32th
HellaSwag 75.1 441 27th
MMMU 59.2 438 27th
Arena Elo 1303.0 413 31th

FAQ

What score does Sonar Nano get on LiveCodeBench?

Sonar Nano scores 55.1 on LiveCodeBench in this index. The benchmark average is 61.0 and the top score is 85.1.

How does Sonar Nano rank on LiveCodeBench?

It ranks #404 of 600 models, in the 33rd percentile. The leader is Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning at 85.1.

Is Sonar Nano good at LiveCodeBench?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the LiveCodeBench score calculated?

LiveCodeBench is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Sonar Nano cost?

Sonar Nano costs $4.37 per million input tokens and $16.96 per million output tokens.

Related