Mathematics · Perplexity

Sonar Nano on MATH-500: score, rank and what it means

Sonar Nano scores 66.7 on MATH-500, placing it #411 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 72.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.7.

Score
66.7
0–100 scale
Rank
#411
of 600
Percentile
32th
within the index
Benchmark avg
72.5
all models
Leader
96.7
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
30.0
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MATH-500, with Sonar Nano highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 96.7
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 95.9
GPT-5.1 Pro 95.1
o4 Reasoning 94.8
Grok 4 Max 94.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 94.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 94.2
Claude Opus 4.5 93.7
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 93.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo 93.2

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
5 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
6 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
9 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo Anthropic 2000000 $19.57 85.7

What this score means

On MATH-500, Sonar Nano sits at #411 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 96.7, so the gap to the top is 30.0 points. The median model in this index scores 76.0, which puts Sonar Nano below the midpoint.

Perplexity models average 78.7 on this benchmark. Sonar Nano is 12.0 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Perplexity model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 70.0. Sonar Nano is 3.3 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 66.7 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $4.37 per million input tokens, Sonar Nano is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MATH-500. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
DeepSeek-R1 8B DeepSeek 16384 $1.87 64.3
Reka Flash Mini Reka AI 16384 $5.77 65.5
SmolLM3 Instruct Hugging Face 8192 $1.69 63.6
DeepSeek-V3.2 8B DeepSeek 32768 $2.02 66.2
Sonar Nano Perplexity 4096 $4.37 61.9
Embed 4 Cohere 32768 $4.79 63.8
Hunyuan-Turbo Nano Tencent 32768 $4.65 62.7

Other benchmarks for Sonar Nano

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 65.8 439 27th
GPQA Diamond 57.4 434 28th
SWE-bench Verified 48.4 435 28th
HumanEval 63.7 453 25th
AIME 2025 50.6 456 24th
LiveCodeBench 55.1 404 33th
IFEval 70.7 446 26th
TruthfulQA 68.5 409 32th
HellaSwag 75.1 441 27th
MMMU 59.2 438 27th
Arena Elo 1303.0 413 31th

FAQ

What score does Sonar Nano get on MATH-500?

Sonar Nano scores 66.7 on MATH-500 in this index. The benchmark average is 72.5 and the top score is 96.7.

How does Sonar Nano rank on MATH-500?

It ranks #411 of 600 models, in the 32nd percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.7.

Is Sonar Nano good at MATH-500?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MATH-500 score calculated?

MATH-500 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Sonar Nano cost?

Sonar Nano costs $4.37 per million input tokens and $16.96 per million output tokens.

Related