Mathematics · Perplexity

Sonar Pro Nano on AIME 2025: score, rank and what it means

Sonar Pro Nano scores 58.8 on AIME 2025, placing it #395 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Score
58.8
0–100 scale
Rank
#395
of 600
Percentile
34th
within the index
Benchmark avg
63.6
all models
Leader
91.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro
Gap to leader
32.6
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on AIME 2025, with Sonar Pro Nano highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 91.4
GPT-5.2 Pro 91.0
GPT-5.1 Pro 90.6
GPT-5.2 90.6
o4 Reasoning 90.3
o4 Pro 89.9
Claude Opus 4.5 89.8
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 89.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 88.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
2 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
5 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
6 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
8 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2

What this score means

On AIME 2025, Sonar Pro Nano sits at #395 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Pro, scores 91.4, so the gap to the top is 32.6 points. The median model in this index scores 67.6, which puts Sonar Pro Nano below the midpoint.

Perplexity models average 69.8 on this benchmark. Sonar Pro Nano is 11.0 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Perplexity model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 60.1. Sonar Pro Nano is 1.3 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 58.8 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $5.50 per million input tokens, Sonar Pro Nano is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on AIME 2025. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Reka Flash Mini Reka AI 16384 $5.77 65.5
Molmo Allen Institute for AI 32768 $2.49 68.5
Firesearch Fireworks AI 32768 $7.03 68.5
Nova Lite Mini Amazon 16384 $5.43 65.0
Sonar Pro Nano Perplexity 32768 $5.50 66.1
Nemotron Nano Instruct NVIDIA 32768 $2.33 67.4
DeepSeek-R1 8B DeepSeek 16384 $1.87 64.3

Other benchmarks for Sonar Pro Nano

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 68.6 410 32th
GPQA Diamond 62.5 387 36th
SWE-bench Verified 55.4 381 37th
HumanEval 69.6 402 33th
MATH-500 69.0 389 35th
LiveCodeBench 58.2 388 35th
IFEval 73.1 416 31th
TruthfulQA 70.6 395 34th
HellaSwag 79.7 385 36th
MMMU 61.2 418 30th
Arena Elo 1328.5 390 35th

FAQ

What score does Sonar Pro Nano get on AIME 2025?

Sonar Pro Nano scores 58.8 on AIME 2025 in this index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the top score is 91.4.

How does Sonar Pro Nano rank on AIME 2025?

It ranks #395 of 600 models, in the 34th percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Is Sonar Pro Nano good at AIME 2025?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the AIME 2025 score calculated?

AIME 2025 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Sonar Pro Nano cost?

Sonar Pro Nano costs $5.50 per million input tokens and $22.25 per million output tokens.

Related