Coding · Perplexity

Sonar Pro Nano on LiveCodeBench: score, rank and what it means

Sonar Pro Nano scores 58.2 on LiveCodeBench, placing it #388 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 61.0 and the leader is Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning at 85.1.

Score
58.2
0–100 scale
Rank
#388
of 600
Percentile
35th
within the index
Benchmark avg
61.0
all models
Leader
85.1
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning
Gap to leader
26.9
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on LiveCodeBench, with Sonar Pro Nano highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.1
Grok 4 Reasoning 85.1
Claude Opus 4.5 85.0
GPT-5.2 Max 84.8
Grok 4 Turbo 84.7
GPT-5.1 Turbo 84.6
GPT-5.2 Pro 84.6
GPT-5.2 Reasoning 84.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 84.1
Gemini 3 Pro Max 83.6

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
2 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
4 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
5 Grok 4 Turbo xAI 1000000 $19.21 86.7
6 GPT-5.1 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.19 86.1
7 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
8 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
10 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9

What this score means

On LiveCodeBench, Sonar Pro Nano sits at #388 of 600. The leader, Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning, scores 85.1, so the gap to the top is 26.9 points. The median model in this index scores 64.7, which puts Sonar Pro Nano below the midpoint.

Perplexity models average 68.2 on this benchmark. Sonar Pro Nano is 10.0 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Perplexity model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 58.3. Sonar Pro Nano is 0.1 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 58.2 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $5.50 per million input tokens, Sonar Pro Nano is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on LiveCodeBench. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
DBRX Base Databricks 32768 $2.63 69.1
Nemotron Nano NVIDIA 8192 $2.24 66.6
Embed 4 Max Cohere 8192 $5.68 66.1
Reka Flash Mini Reka AI 16384 $5.77 65.5
Sonar Pro Nano Perplexity 32768 $5.50 66.1
OLMo 2 Base Allen Institute for AI 65536 $2.39 67.4
Doubao 1.5 Pro Nano ByteDance 16384 $5.78 66.6

Other benchmarks for Sonar Pro Nano

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 68.6 410 32th
GPQA Diamond 62.5 387 36th
SWE-bench Verified 55.4 381 37th
HumanEval 69.6 402 33th
MATH-500 69.0 389 35th
AIME 2025 58.8 395 34th
IFEval 73.1 416 31th
TruthfulQA 70.6 395 34th
HellaSwag 79.7 385 36th
MMMU 61.2 418 30th
Arena Elo 1328.5 390 35th

FAQ

What score does Sonar Pro Nano get on LiveCodeBench?

Sonar Pro Nano scores 58.2 on LiveCodeBench in this index. The benchmark average is 61.0 and the top score is 85.1.

How does Sonar Pro Nano rank on LiveCodeBench?

It ranks #388 of 600 models, in the 35th percentile. The leader is Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning at 85.1.

Is Sonar Pro Nano good at LiveCodeBench?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the LiveCodeBench score calculated?

LiveCodeBench is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Sonar Pro Nano cost?

Sonar Pro Nano costs $5.50 per million input tokens and $22.25 per million output tokens.

Related