Multimodal · Perplexity

Sonar Pro Nano on MMMU: score, rank and what it means

Sonar Pro Nano scores 61.2 on MMMU, placing it #418 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Score
61.2
0–100 scale
Rank
#418
of 600
Percentile
30th
within the index
Benchmark avg
67.1
all models
Leader
86.9
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
25.7
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MMMU, with Sonar Pro Nano highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 86.9
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 86.2
GPT-5.2 85.3
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.1 Max 85.1
Grok 4 Pro 84.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 84.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro 84.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 84.4
GPT-5.2 Vision 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
5 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
6 Grok 4 Pro xAI 1000000 $19.00 85.4
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
8 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro Anthropic 1000000 $18.73 86.7
9 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
10 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4

What this score means

On MMMU, Sonar Pro Nano sits at #418 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 86.9, so the gap to the top is 25.7 points. The median model in this index scores 70.0, which puts Sonar Pro Nano below the midpoint.

Perplexity models average 71.2 on this benchmark. Sonar Pro Nano is 10.0 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Perplexity model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 65.0. Sonar Pro Nano is 3.8 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 61.2 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $5.50 per million input tokens, Sonar Pro Nano is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMMU. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
ERNIE 4.0 Nano Baidu 32768 $4.68 62.1
Reka Flash Mini Reka AI 16384 $5.77 65.5
ERNIE 4.5 Nano Baidu 32768 $6.01 65.6
DeepSeek-V3.2 7B DeepSeek 4096 $1.75 63.2
Sonar Pro Nano Perplexity 32768 $5.50 66.1
Firesearch Mini Fireworks AI 32768 $3.94 61.5
Kimi K1.5 8B Moonshot AI 8192 $1.54 62.2

Other benchmarks for Sonar Pro Nano

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 68.6 410 32th
GPQA Diamond 62.5 387 36th
SWE-bench Verified 55.4 381 37th
HumanEval 69.6 402 33th
MATH-500 69.0 389 35th
AIME 2025 58.8 395 34th
LiveCodeBench 58.2 388 35th
IFEval 73.1 416 31th
TruthfulQA 70.6 395 34th
HellaSwag 79.7 385 36th
Arena Elo 1328.5 390 35th

FAQ

What score does Sonar Pro Nano get on MMMU?

Sonar Pro Nano scores 61.2 on MMMU in this index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the top score is 86.9.

How does Sonar Pro Nano rank on MMMU?

It ranks #418 of 600 models, in the 30th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Is Sonar Pro Nano good at MMMU?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MMMU score calculated?

MMMU is a multimodal benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Sonar Pro Nano cost?

Sonar Pro Nano costs $5.50 per million input tokens and $22.25 per million output tokens.

Related