Mathematics · Perplexity

Sonar Pro Pro on AIME 2025: score, rank and what it means

Sonar Pro Pro scores 80.6 on AIME 2025, placing it #80 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Score
80.6
0–100 scale
Rank
#80
of 600
Percentile
87th
within the index
Benchmark avg
63.6
all models
Leader
91.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro
Gap to leader
10.8
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on AIME 2025, with Sonar Pro Pro highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 91.4
GPT-5.2 Pro 91.0
GPT-5.1 Pro 90.6
GPT-5.2 90.6
o4 Reasoning 90.3
o4 Pro 89.9
Claude Opus 4.5 89.8
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 89.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 88.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
2 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
5 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
6 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
8 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2

What this score means

On AIME 2025, Sonar Pro Pro sits at #80 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Pro, scores 91.4, so the gap to the top is 10.8 points. The median model in this index scores 67.6, which puts Sonar Pro Pro above the midpoint.

Perplexity models average 69.8 on this benchmark. Sonar Pro Pro is 10.8 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Perplexity model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 73.9. Sonar Pro Pro is 6.7 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 80.6 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $13.59 per million input tokens, Sonar Pro Pro is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on AIME 2025. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Claude 3.7 Sonnet Vision Anthropic 400000 $13.96 81.0
Kimi K1.5 Moonshot AI 128000 $5.19 80.7
Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max Anthropic 128000 $16.88 83.7
ERNIE 4.5 Turbo Baidu 128000 $13.75 79.7
Sonar Pro Pro Perplexity 200000 $13.59 79.7
o3 Reasoning OpenAI 200000 $18.07 85.3
Doubao 1.5 Pro Max ByteDance 400000 $14.93 81.2

Other benchmarks for Sonar Pro Pro

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 79.4 202 66th
GPQA Diamond 72.6 210 65th
SWE-bench Verified 69.7 118 80th
HumanEval 83.0 160 73th
MATH-500 81.9 169 72th
LiveCodeBench 74.2 105 83th
IFEval 87.9 105 83th
TruthfulQA 79.3 208 65th
HellaSwag 88.7 122 80th
MMMU 78.9 77 87th
Arena Elo 1434.0 111 82th

FAQ

What score does Sonar Pro Pro get on AIME 2025?

Sonar Pro Pro scores 80.6 on AIME 2025 in this index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the top score is 91.4.

How does Sonar Pro Pro rank on AIME 2025?

It ranks #80 of 600 models, in the 87th percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Is Sonar Pro Pro good at AIME 2025?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the AIME 2025 score calculated?

AIME 2025 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Sonar Pro Pro cost?

Sonar Pro Pro costs $13.59 per million input tokens and $73.47 per million output tokens.

Related