Sonar Pro on GPQA Diamond: score, rank and what it means
Sonar Pro scores 77.1 on GPQA Diamond, placing it #105 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 65.6 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Reasoning at 87.0.
Score distribution
The chart shows the top 10 models on GPQA Diamond, with Sonar Pro highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.
Top 10 leaderboard
| # | Model | Provider | Context | Input / 1M | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5.2 Reasoning | OpenAI | 1000000 | $20.98 | 87.5 |
| 2 | GPT-5.1 Max | OpenAI | 2000000 | $20.50 | 87.9 |
| 3 | Claude Opus 4.5 Pro | Anthropic | 200000 | $20.98 | 89.1 |
| 4 | GPT-5.1 Reasoning | OpenAI | 400000 | $20.27 | 88.3 |
| 5 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning | Anthropic | 400000 | $19.48 | 87.7 |
| 6 | GPT-5.2 | OpenAI | 2000000 | $19.71 | 88.0 |
| 7 | o4 Turbo | OpenAI | 2000000 | $19.34 | 86.6 |
| 8 | Claude Opus 4.5 Max | Anthropic | 1000000 | $20.90 | 87.8 |
| 9 | Grok 4 Turbo | xAI | 1000000 | $19.21 | 86.7 |
| 10 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max | Anthropic | 1000000 | $19.90 | 87.2 |
What this score means
On GPQA Diamond, Sonar Pro sits at #105 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Reasoning, scores 87.0, so the gap to the top is 9.9 points. The median model in this index scores 68.8, which puts Sonar Pro above the midpoint.
Perplexity models average 70.7 on this benchmark. Sonar Pro is 6.4 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Perplexity model.
Among multimodal models, the average is 73.5. Sonar Pro is 3.6 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.
Read a 77.1 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.
Price context
At $13.01 per million input tokens, Sonar Pro is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on GPQA Diamond. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.
| Model | Provider | Context | Input / 1M | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grok 3 Reasoning | xAI | 200000 | $16.07 | 82.9 |
| ERNIE 4.5 | Baidu | 65536 | $13.44 | 80.0 |
| DeepSeek-V3.2 Base | DeepSeek | 128000 | $5.05 | 80.2 |
| Llama 4 Scout Chat | Meta AI | 32768 | $4.66 | 78.0 |
| Sonar Pro | Perplexity | 128000 | $13.01 | 79.1 |
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max | Anthropic | 128000 | $16.88 | 83.7 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | Meta AI | 200000 | $5.36 | 81.6 |
Other benchmarks for Sonar Pro
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Percentile | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 78.7 | 224 | 63th | |
| SWE-bench Verified | 68.9 | 132 | 78th | |
| HumanEval | 82.6 | 170 | 72th | |
| MATH-500 | 80.7 | 196 | 67th | |
| AIME 2025 | 74.7 | 162 | 73th | |
| LiveCodeBench | 75.0 | 96 | 84th | |
| IFEval | 87.4 | 125 | 79th | |
| TruthfulQA | 82.5 | 119 | 80th | |
| HellaSwag | 86.5 | 196 | 67th | |
| MMMU | 75.7 | 146 | 76th | |
| Arena Elo | 1411.3 | 181 | 70th |
FAQ
What score does Sonar Pro get on GPQA Diamond?
Sonar Pro scores 77.1 on GPQA Diamond in this index. The benchmark average is 65.6 and the top score is 87.0.
How does Sonar Pro rank on GPQA Diamond?
It ranks #105 of 600 models, in the 83rd percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Reasoning at 87.0.
Is Sonar Pro good at GPQA Diamond?
Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.
How is the GPQA Diamond score calculated?
GPQA Diamond is a reasoning benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.
What does Sonar Pro cost?
Sonar Pro costs $13.01 per million input tokens and $50.93 per million output tokens.