Knowledge · Perplexity

Sonar Reasoning on MMLU-Pro: score, rank and what it means

Sonar Reasoning scores 76.8 on MMLU-Pro, placing it #284 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 73.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 91.6.

Score
76.8
0–100 scale
Rank
#284
of 600
Percentile
53th
within the index
Benchmark avg
73.5
all models
Leader
91.6
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
14.8
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MMLU-Pro, with Sonar Reasoning highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 91.6
GPT-5.1 Max 91.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 91.2
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 90.7
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 90.1
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 90.0
GPT-5.2 89.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 89.5
GPT-5.2 Vision 89.5
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.5

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
4 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
5 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
6 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
7 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
9 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4
10 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9

What this score means

On MMLU-Pro, Sonar Reasoning sits at #284 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 91.6, so the gap to the top is 14.8 points. The median model in this index scores 76.1, which puts Sonar Reasoning above the midpoint.

Perplexity models average 77.4 on this benchmark. Sonar Reasoning is 0.6 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Perplexity model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 80.0. Sonar Reasoning is 3.2 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 76.8 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $11.48 per million input tokens, Sonar Reasoning is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMLU-Pro. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Llama 3 Anyscale Instruct Anyscale 200000 $3.91 75.7
Llama 3 DeepInfra Chat DeepInfra 200000 $3.74 75.0
Llama 3 Lambda Chat Lambda 32768 $3.73 74.7
Llama 3 Modal Chat Modal 65536 $3.55 73.3
Sonar Reasoning Perplexity 200000 $11.48 76.2
GPT-4.1 Mini OpenAI 128000 $10.43 74.3
Mistral Small 3 Chat Mistral AI 200000 $3.54 73.7

Other benchmarks for Sonar Reasoning

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
GPQA Diamond 74.6 152 75th
SWE-bench Verified 64.6 220 63th
HumanEval 79.2 261 57th
MATH-500 80.4 202 66th
AIME 2025 70.9 239 60th
LiveCodeBench 71.2 166 72th
IFEval 85.1 189 69th
TruthfulQA 78.0 254 58th
HellaSwag 86.2 210 65th
MMMU 71.5 260 57th
Arena Elo 1404.5 196 67th

FAQ

What score does Sonar Reasoning get on MMLU-Pro?

Sonar Reasoning scores 76.8 on MMLU-Pro in this index. The benchmark average is 73.5 and the top score is 91.6.

How does Sonar Reasoning rank on MMLU-Pro?

It ranks #284 of 600 models, in the 53rd percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 91.6.

Is Sonar Reasoning good at MMLU-Pro?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MMLU-Pro score calculated?

MMLU-Pro is a knowledge benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Sonar Reasoning cost?

Sonar Reasoning costs $11.48 per million input tokens and $62.24 per million output tokens.

Related