Mathematics · Perplexity

Sonar on AIME 2025: score, rank and what it means

Sonar scores 73.9 on AIME 2025, placing it #187 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Score
73.9
0–100 scale
Rank
#187
of 600
Percentile
69th
within the index
Benchmark avg
63.6
all models
Leader
91.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro
Gap to leader
17.5
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on AIME 2025, with Sonar highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 91.4
GPT-5.2 Pro 91.0
GPT-5.1 Pro 90.6
GPT-5.2 90.6
o4 Reasoning 90.3
o4 Pro 89.9
Claude Opus 4.5 89.8
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 89.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 88.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
2 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
5 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
6 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
8 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2

What this score means

On AIME 2025, Sonar sits at #187 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Pro, scores 91.4, so the gap to the top is 17.5 points. The median model in this index scores 67.6, which puts Sonar above the midpoint.

Perplexity models average 69.8 on this benchmark. Sonar is 4.1 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Perplexity model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 73.9. Sonar is 0.0 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 73.9 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $10.57 per million input tokens, Sonar is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on AIME 2025. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Qwen3-Coder Chat Alibaba Cloud 128000 $4.59 78.4
Codestral Chat Mistral AI 32768 $3.89 75.8
Llama 3.3 Meta AI 128000 $4.56 78.2
Reka Flash Reasoning Reka AI 32768 $10.70 75.6
Sonar Perplexity 200000 $10.57 76.0
Sonar Pro Turbo Perplexity 128000 $13.55 79.0
DeepSeek-R1 Base DeepSeek 400000 $5.05 80.1

Other benchmarks for Sonar

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 79.1 207 66th
GPQA Diamond 71.2 237 61th
SWE-bench Verified 65.8 198 67th
HumanEval 81.9 188 69th
MATH-500 76.3 294 51th
LiveCodeBench 68.5 217 64th
IFEval 84.7 198 67th
TruthfulQA 78.7 230 62th
HellaSwag 86.0 217 64th
MMMU 70.1 300 50th
Arena Elo 1394.1 233 61th

FAQ

What score does Sonar get on AIME 2025?

Sonar scores 73.9 on AIME 2025 in this index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the top score is 91.4.

How does Sonar rank on AIME 2025?

It ranks #187 of 600 models, in the 69th percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Is Sonar good at AIME 2025?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the AIME 2025 score calculated?

AIME 2025 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Sonar cost?

Sonar costs $10.57 per million input tokens and $50.13 per million output tokens.

Related