Mathematics · Perplexity

Sonar on MATH-500: score, rank and what it means

Sonar scores 76.3 on MATH-500, placing it #294 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 72.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.7.

Score
76.3
0–100 scale
Rank
#294
of 600
Percentile
51th
within the index
Benchmark avg
72.5
all models
Leader
96.7
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
20.4
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MATH-500, with Sonar highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 96.7
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 95.9
GPT-5.1 Pro 95.1
o4 Reasoning 94.8
Grok 4 Max 94.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 94.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 94.2
Claude Opus 4.5 93.7
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 93.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo 93.2

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
5 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
6 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
9 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo Anthropic 2000000 $19.57 85.7

What this score means

On MATH-500, Sonar sits at #294 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 96.7, so the gap to the top is 20.4 points. The median model in this index scores 76.0, which puts Sonar above the midpoint.

Perplexity models average 78.7 on this benchmark. Sonar is 2.4 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Perplexity model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 81.3. Sonar is 5.0 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 76.3 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $10.57 per million input tokens, Sonar is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MATH-500. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Firefunction Reasoning Fireworks AI 8192 $9.08 72.5
DBRX Databricks 65536 $3.29 73.3
Llama 3 Hyperbolic Hyperbolic 65536 $3.86 74.5
Magistral Base Mistral AI 65536 $3.86 75.6
Sonar Perplexity 200000 $10.57 76.0
Yi-Large 01.AI 32768 $3.40 73.5
Llama 3 Novita Chat Novita AI 65536 $3.50 74.2

Other benchmarks for Sonar

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 79.1 207 66th
GPQA Diamond 71.2 237 61th
SWE-bench Verified 65.8 198 67th
HumanEval 81.9 188 69th
AIME 2025 73.9 187 69th
LiveCodeBench 68.5 217 64th
IFEval 84.7 198 67th
TruthfulQA 78.7 230 62th
HellaSwag 86.0 217 64th
MMMU 70.1 300 50th
Arena Elo 1394.1 233 61th

FAQ

What score does Sonar get on MATH-500?

Sonar scores 76.3 on MATH-500 in this index. The benchmark average is 72.5 and the top score is 96.7.

How does Sonar rank on MATH-500?

It ranks #294 of 600 models, in the 51st percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.7.

Is Sonar good at MATH-500?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MATH-500 score calculated?

MATH-500 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Sonar cost?

Sonar costs $10.57 per million input tokens and $50.13 per million output tokens.

Related