Multimodal · Perplexity

Sonar on MMMU: score, rank and what it means

Sonar scores 70.1 on MMMU, placing it #300 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Score
70.1
0–100 scale
Rank
#300
of 600
Percentile
50th
within the index
Benchmark avg
67.1
all models
Leader
86.9
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
16.8
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MMMU, with Sonar highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 86.9
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 86.2
GPT-5.2 85.3
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.1 Max 85.1
Grok 4 Pro 84.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 84.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro 84.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 84.4
GPT-5.2 Vision 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
5 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
6 Grok 4 Pro xAI 1000000 $19.00 85.4
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
8 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro Anthropic 1000000 $18.73 86.7
9 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
10 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4

What this score means

On MMMU, Sonar sits at #300 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 86.9, so the gap to the top is 16.8 points. The median model in this index scores 70.0, which puts Sonar above the midpoint.

Perplexity models average 71.2 on this benchmark. Sonar is 1.2 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Perplexity model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 74.3. Sonar is 4.2 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 70.1 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $10.57 per million input tokens, Sonar is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMMU. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
o4 Nano OpenAI 65536 $8.61 72.0
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Nano Anthropic 8192 $8.93 72.0
Llama 3.1 Cerebras Cerebras 128000 $4.01 76.0
MiniMax-Text Base MiniMax 128000 $3.66 74.9
Sonar Perplexity 200000 $10.57 76.0
Auto Turbo OpenRouter 65536 $7.96 70.9
Codestral Instruct Mistral AI 65536 $4.01 75.1

Other benchmarks for Sonar

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 79.1 207 66th
GPQA Diamond 71.2 237 61th
SWE-bench Verified 65.8 198 67th
HumanEval 81.9 188 69th
MATH-500 76.3 294 51th
AIME 2025 73.9 187 69th
LiveCodeBench 68.5 217 64th
IFEval 84.7 198 67th
TruthfulQA 78.7 230 62th
HellaSwag 86.0 217 64th
Arena Elo 1394.1 233 61th

FAQ

What score does Sonar get on MMMU?

Sonar scores 70.1 on MMMU in this index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the top score is 86.9.

How does Sonar rank on MMMU?

It ranks #300 of 600 models, in the 50th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Is Sonar good at MMMU?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MMMU score calculated?

MMMU is a multimodal benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Sonar cost?

Sonar costs $10.57 per million input tokens and $50.13 per million output tokens.

Related