Coding · Stability AI

StableLM 2 1.5B on SWE-bench Verified: score, rank and what it means

StableLM 2 1.5B scores 19.4 on SWE-bench Verified, placing it #597 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 57.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 81.7.

Score
19.4
0–100 scale
Rank
#597
of 600
Percentile
1th
within the index
Benchmark avg
57.5
all models
Leader
81.7
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
62.3
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on SWE-bench Verified, with StableLM 2 1.5B highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 81.7
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 81.1
GPT-5.2 Max 80.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max 80.2
GPT-5.2 80.2
GPT-5.1 Pro 80.1
o4 Max 79.8
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 79.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 79.5
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 79.5

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
3 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $19.90 87.2
5 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
6 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
7 o4 Max OpenAI 2000000 $19.51 86.2
8 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2

What this score means

On SWE-bench Verified, StableLM 2 1.5B sits at #597 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 81.7, so the gap to the top is 62.3 points. The median model in this index scores 61.0, which puts StableLM 2 1.5B below the midpoint.

Stability AI models average 40.6 on this benchmark. StableLM 2 1.5B is 21.2 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Stability AI model.

Among small open-weight models, the average is 39.0. StableLM 2 1.5B is 19.6 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 19.4 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $0.13 per million input tokens, StableLM 2 1.5B is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on SWE-bench Verified. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Nemotron Nano 1.5B NVIDIA 8192 $0.10 41.5
Zephyr 8B Hugging Face 8192 $0.22 43.0
Zephyr 7B Hugging Face 32768 $0.23 42.5
Pythia 1.5B EleutherAI 4096 $0.10 35.8
StableLM 2 1.5B Stability AI 16384 $0.13 38.3
Zephyr 1.5B Hugging Face 32768 $0.10 38.0
SmolLM3 1.5B Hugging Face 8192 $0.04 36.8

Other benchmarks for StableLM 2 1.5B

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 48.2 597 1th
GPQA Diamond 32.7 597 1th
HumanEval 39.5 598 1th
MATH-500 34.3 599 1th
AIME 2025 24.8 595 1th
LiveCodeBench 22.2 597 1th
IFEval 50.8 598 1th
TruthfulQA 49.8 593 1th
HellaSwag 59.4 597 1th
MMMU 39.8 595 1th
Arena Elo 1103.1 598 1th

FAQ

What score does StableLM 2 1.5B get on SWE-bench Verified?

StableLM 2 1.5B scores 19.4 on SWE-bench Verified in this index. The benchmark average is 57.5 and the top score is 81.7.

How does StableLM 2 1.5B rank on SWE-bench Verified?

It ranks #597 of 600 models, in the 1st percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 81.7.

Is StableLM 2 1.5B good at SWE-bench Verified?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the SWE-bench Verified score calculated?

SWE-bench Verified is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does StableLM 2 1.5B cost?

StableLM 2 1.5B costs $0.13 per million input tokens and $0.46 per million output tokens.

Related