Safety · Stability AI

StableLM 2 Chat on TruthfulQA: score, rank and what it means

StableLM 2 Chat scores 70.1 on TruthfulQA, placing it #399 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 73.6 and the leader is GPT-5.1 Max at 91.1.

Score
70.1
0–100 scale
Rank
#399
of 600
Percentile
34th
within the index
Benchmark avg
73.6
all models
Leader
91.1
GPT-5.1 Max
Gap to leader
21.0
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on TruthfulQA, with StableLM 2 Chat highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.1 Max 91.1
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 90.3
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 90.0
GPT-5.2 Pro 90.0
GPT-5.2 89.7
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 89.4
Qwen3-Max Max 89.3
GPT-5.1 89.2
GPT-5.1 Turbo 89.2

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
2 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
3 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
4 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
5 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
6 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
7 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
8 Qwen3-Max Max Alibaba Cloud 400000 $18.53 85.9
9 GPT-5.1 OpenAI 2000000 $19.01 86.0
10 GPT-5.1 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.19 86.1

What this score means

On TruthfulQA, StableLM 2 Chat sits at #399 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.1 Max, scores 91.1, so the gap to the top is 21.0 points. The median model in this index scores 76.3, which puts StableLM 2 Chat below the midpoint.

Stability AI models average 61.9 on this benchmark. StableLM 2 Chat is 8.2 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Stability AI model.

Among open-weight models, the average is 72.3. StableLM 2 Chat is 2.2 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 70.1 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $1.79 per million input tokens, StableLM 2 Chat is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on TruthfulQA. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Sonar Pro Nano Perplexity 32768 $5.50 66.1
Embed 4 Reasoning Cohere 4096 $5.50 65.3
Nemotron Nano Chat NVIDIA 32768 $2.21 66.2
Fusion Mini OpenRouter 4096 $4.89 63.3
StableLM 2 Chat Stability AI 8192 $1.79 64.6
StableLM 2 Instruct Stability AI 16384 $1.93 65.2
Embed 4 Cohere 32768 $4.79 63.8

Other benchmarks for StableLM 2 Chat

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 66.4 436 27th
GPQA Diamond 61.8 392 35th
SWE-bench Verified 51.6 410 32th
HumanEval 69.7 400 33th
MATH-500 68.0 401 33th
AIME 2025 52.6 439 27th
LiveCodeBench 55.7 399 34th
IFEval 74.9 400 33th
HellaSwag 78.7 396 34th
MMMU 61.0 421 30th
Arena Elo 1297.5 425 29th

FAQ

What score does StableLM 2 Chat get on TruthfulQA?

StableLM 2 Chat scores 70.1 on TruthfulQA in this index. The benchmark average is 73.6 and the top score is 91.1.

How does StableLM 2 Chat rank on TruthfulQA?

It ranks #399 of 600 models, in the 34th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.1 Max at 91.1.

Is StableLM 2 Chat good at TruthfulQA?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the TruthfulQA score calculated?

TruthfulQA is a safety benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does StableLM 2 Chat cost?

StableLM 2 Chat costs $1.79 per million input tokens and $9.72 per million output tokens.

Related