Coding · 01.AI

Yi-Large Base on HumanEval: score, rank and what it means

Yi-Large Base scores 73.3 on HumanEval, placing it #369 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Score
73.3
0–100 scale
Rank
#369
of 600
Percentile
39th
within the index
Benchmark avg
74.0
all models
Leader
96.8
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
23.5
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on HumanEval, with Yi-Large Base highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 96.8
Gemini 3 Pro Pro 95.0
o4 Max 94.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 93.8
Claude Opus 4.5 93.7
GPT-5.2 Max 93.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 93.4
Grok 4 Max 93.4
GPT-5.2 Turbo 93.2
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 92.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 Gemini 3 Pro Pro Google DeepMind 200000 $19.80 87.3
3 o4 Max OpenAI 2000000 $19.51 86.2
4 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
5 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
6 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
8 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
9 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
10 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3

What this score means

On HumanEval, Yi-Large Base sits at #369 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 96.8, so the gap to the top is 23.5 points. The median model in this index scores 77.4, which puts Yi-Large Base below the midpoint.

01.AI models average 69.1 on this benchmark. Yi-Large Base is 4.2 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average 01.AI model.

Among open-weight models, the average is 72.4. Yi-Large Base is 0.9 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 73.3 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $2.78 per million input tokens, Yi-Large Base is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HumanEval. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Firesearch Fireworks AI 32768 $7.03 68.5
Firesearch Turbo Fireworks AI 16384 $7.58 69.3
Firefunction Turbo Fireworks AI 32768 $8.44 70.7
Llama 3 Novita Base Novita AI 8192 $3.06 70.3
Yi-Large Base 01.AI 16384 $2.78 70.3
Arctic Snowflake 8192 $2.72 68.8
Phi-3.5 Base Microsoft 65536 $2.24 66.6

Other benchmarks for Yi-Large Base

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 75.4 322 46th
GPQA Diamond 68.0 312 48th
SWE-bench Verified 56.8 370 38th
MATH-500 71.2 378 37th
AIME 2025 60.4 386 36th
LiveCodeBench 60.6 361 40th
IFEval 80.4 327 46th
TruthfulQA 75.9 311 48th
HellaSwag 83.0 322 46th
MMMU 68.6 333 45th
Arena Elo 1353.7 357 41th

FAQ

What score does Yi-Large Base get on HumanEval?

Yi-Large Base scores 73.3 on HumanEval in this index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the top score is 96.8.

How does Yi-Large Base rank on HumanEval?

It ranks #369 of 600 models, in the 39th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Is Yi-Large Base good at HumanEval?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the HumanEval score calculated?

HumanEval is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Yi-Large Base cost?

Yi-Large Base costs $2.78 per million input tokens and $10.84 per million output tokens.

Related