Safety · Hugging Face

Zephyr 1.5B on TruthfulQA: score, rank and what it means

Zephyr 1.5B scores 47.2 on TruthfulQA, placing it #596 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 73.6 and the leader is GPT-5.1 Max at 91.1.

Score
47.2
0–100 scale
Rank
#596
of 600
Percentile
1th
within the index
Benchmark avg
73.6
all models
Leader
91.1
GPT-5.1 Max
Gap to leader
43.9
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on TruthfulQA, with Zephyr 1.5B highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.1 Max 91.1
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 90.3
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 90.0
GPT-5.2 Pro 90.0
GPT-5.2 89.7
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 89.4
Qwen3-Max Max 89.3
GPT-5.1 89.2
GPT-5.1 Turbo 89.2

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
2 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
3 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
4 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
5 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
6 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
7 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
8 Qwen3-Max Max Alibaba Cloud 400000 $18.53 85.9
9 GPT-5.1 OpenAI 2000000 $19.01 86.0
10 GPT-5.1 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.19 86.1

What this score means

On TruthfulQA, Zephyr 1.5B sits at #596 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.1 Max, scores 91.1, so the gap to the top is 43.9 points. The median model in this index scores 76.3, which puts Zephyr 1.5B below the midpoint.

Hugging Face models average 59.1 on this benchmark. Zephyr 1.5B is 11.9 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Hugging Face model.

Among small open-weight models, the average is 59.9. Zephyr 1.5B is 12.7 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 47.2 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $0.10 per million input tokens, Zephyr 1.5B is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on TruthfulQA. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Arctic 1.5B Snowflake 32768 $0.15 43.2
StableLM 2 1.5B Stability AI 16384 $0.13 38.3
Pythia 8B EleutherAI 32768 $0.16 41.4
Molmo 1.5B Allen Institute for AI 8192 $0.21 42.8
Zephyr 1.5B Hugging Face 32768 $0.10 38.0
Pythia 7B EleutherAI 8192 $0.10 40.7
Pythia 1.5B EleutherAI 4096 $0.10 35.8

Other benchmarks for Zephyr 1.5B

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 48.3 596 1th
GPQA Diamond 35.2 595 1th
SWE-bench Verified 18.7 598 1th
HumanEval 41.2 596 1th
MATH-500 35.5 598 1th
AIME 2025 17.6 599 1th
LiveCodeBench 22.3 596 1th
IFEval 52.6 594 1th
HellaSwag 60.4 596 1th
MMMU 39.1 596 1th
Arena Elo 1105.1 597 1th

FAQ

What score does Zephyr 1.5B get on TruthfulQA?

Zephyr 1.5B scores 47.2 on TruthfulQA in this index. The benchmark average is 73.6 and the top score is 91.1.

How does Zephyr 1.5B rank on TruthfulQA?

It ranks #596 of 600 models, in the 1st percentile. The leader is GPT-5.1 Max at 91.1.

Is Zephyr 1.5B good at TruthfulQA?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the TruthfulQA score calculated?

TruthfulQA is a safety benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Zephyr 1.5B cost?

Zephyr 1.5B costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.51 per million output tokens.

Related