Multimodal · Hugging Face

Zephyr Base on MMMU: score, rank and what it means

Zephyr Base scores 54.2 on MMMU, placing it #506 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Score
54.2
0–100 scale
Rank
#506
of 600
Percentile
16th
within the index
Benchmark avg
67.1
all models
Leader
86.9
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
32.7
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MMMU, with Zephyr Base highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 86.9
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 86.2
GPT-5.2 85.3
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.1 Max 85.1
Grok 4 Pro 84.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 84.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro 84.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 84.4
GPT-5.2 Vision 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
5 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
6 Grok 4 Pro xAI 1000000 $19.00 85.4
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
8 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro Anthropic 1000000 $18.73 86.7
9 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
10 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4

What this score means

On MMMU, Zephyr Base sits at #506 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 86.9, so the gap to the top is 32.7 points. The median model in this index scores 70.0, which puts Zephyr Base below the midpoint.

Hugging Face models average 51.0 on this benchmark. Zephyr Base is 3.2 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Hugging Face model.

Among open-weight models, the average is 65.1. Zephyr Base is 10.9 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 54.2 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $1.26 per million input tokens, Zephyr Base is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMMU. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Mixtral 7B Mistral AI 16384 $0.70 54.1
Llama 3.1 7B Meta AI 8192 $1.01 57.4
Llama 3 DeepInfra 8B DeepInfra 8192 $1.05 57.4
Mixtral Turbo 7B Together AI 8192 $0.68 53.2
Zephyr Base Hugging Face 4096 $1.26 59.5
QwQ 7B Alibaba Cloud 8192 $1.11 58.1
Llama 3 Baseten 8B Baseten 4096 $1.02 57.0

Other benchmarks for Zephyr Base

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 65.4 447 26th
GPQA Diamond 57.2 438 27th
SWE-bench Verified 42.4 498 17th
HumanEval 64.8 443 26th
MATH-500 62.6 440 27th
AIME 2025 51.0 452 25th
LiveCodeBench 47.9 468 22th
IFEval 70.3 456 24th
TruthfulQA 65.1 458 24th
HellaSwag 73.1 480 20th
Arena Elo 1270.3 458 24th

FAQ

What score does Zephyr Base get on MMMU?

Zephyr Base scores 54.2 on MMMU in this index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the top score is 86.9.

How does Zephyr Base rank on MMMU?

It ranks #506 of 600 models, in the 16th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Is Zephyr Base good at MMMU?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MMMU score calculated?

MMMU is a multimodal benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Zephyr Base cost?

Zephyr Base costs $1.26 per million input tokens and $6.45 per million output tokens.

Related