Mathematics · Hugging Face

Zephyr Chat on AIME 2025: score, rank and what it means

Zephyr Chat scores 51.8 on AIME 2025, placing it #444 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Score
51.8
0–100 scale
Rank
#444
of 600
Percentile
26th
within the index
Benchmark avg
63.6
all models
Leader
91.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro
Gap to leader
39.6
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on AIME 2025, with Zephyr Chat highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 91.4
GPT-5.2 Pro 91.0
GPT-5.1 Pro 90.6
GPT-5.2 90.6
o4 Reasoning 90.3
o4 Pro 89.9
Claude Opus 4.5 89.8
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 89.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 88.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
2 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
5 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
6 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
8 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2

What this score means

On AIME 2025, Zephyr Chat sits at #444 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Pro, scores 91.4, so the gap to the top is 39.6 points. The median model in this index scores 67.6, which puts Zephyr Chat below the midpoint.

Hugging Face models average 41.0 on this benchmark. Zephyr Chat is 10.8 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Hugging Face model.

Among open-weight models, the average is 61.8. Zephyr Chat is 10.0 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 51.8 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $1.49 per million input tokens, Zephyr Chat is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on AIME 2025. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Firefunction Mini Fireworks AI 32768 $4.63 63.2
Reka Flash Nano Reka AI 16384 $3.93 61.0
Mistral Large 3 7B Mistral AI 32768 $1.44 61.1
Pythia Instruct EleutherAI 8192 $1.41 60.8
Zephyr Chat Hugging Face 4096 $1.49 61.3
Hunyuan-Turbo Nano Tencent 32768 $4.65 62.7
Yi-Lightning 8B 01.AI 4096 $1.16 59.2

Other benchmarks for Zephyr Chat

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 68.4 413 31th
GPQA Diamond 56.7 445 26th
SWE-bench Verified 49.1 429 29th
HumanEval 65.5 436 27th
MATH-500 61.3 451 25th
LiveCodeBench 51.2 438 27th
IFEval 71.8 432 28th
TruthfulQA 64.6 464 23th
HellaSwag 76.5 421 30th
MMMU 56.9 472 21th
Arena Elo 1281.0 443 26th

FAQ

What score does Zephyr Chat get on AIME 2025?

Zephyr Chat scores 51.8 on AIME 2025 in this index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the top score is 91.4.

How does Zephyr Chat rank on AIME 2025?

It ranks #444 of 600 models, in the 26th percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Is Zephyr Chat good at AIME 2025?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the AIME 2025 score calculated?

AIME 2025 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Zephyr Chat cost?

Zephyr Chat costs $1.49 per million input tokens and $8.02 per million output tokens.

Related