Coding · Hugging Face

Zephyr on HumanEval: score, rank and what it means

Zephyr scores 65.9 on HumanEval, placing it #432 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Score
65.9
0–100 scale
Rank
#432
of 600
Percentile
28th
within the index
Benchmark avg
74.0
all models
Leader
96.8
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
30.9
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on HumanEval, with Zephyr highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 96.8
Gemini 3 Pro Pro 95.0
o4 Max 94.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 93.8
Claude Opus 4.5 93.7
GPT-5.2 Max 93.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 93.4
Grok 4 Max 93.4
GPT-5.2 Turbo 93.2
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 92.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 Gemini 3 Pro Pro Google DeepMind 200000 $19.80 87.3
3 o4 Max OpenAI 2000000 $19.51 86.2
4 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
5 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
6 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
8 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
9 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
10 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3

What this score means

On HumanEval, Zephyr sits at #432 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 96.8, so the gap to the top is 30.9 points. The median model in this index scores 77.4, which puts Zephyr below the midpoint.

Hugging Face models average 56.7 on this benchmark. Zephyr is 9.2 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Hugging Face model.

Among open-weight models, the average is 72.4. Zephyr is 6.5 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 65.9 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $1.61 per million input tokens, Zephyr is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HumanEval. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Auto Mini OpenRouter 4096 $4.24 61.6
Kimi K1.5 8B Moonshot AI 8192 $1.54 62.2
Mistral Large 3 7B Mistral AI 32768 $1.44 61.1
Reka Flash Nano Reka AI 16384 $3.93 61.0
Zephyr Hugging Face 8192 $1.61 62.8
MiniMax-M2 8B MiniMax 32768 $1.65 61.7
Qwen3 8B Alibaba Cloud 8192 $1.66 61.9

Other benchmarks for Zephyr

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 68.8 408 32th
GPQA Diamond 60.5 400 33th
SWE-bench Verified 50.3 419 30th
MATH-500 65.3 418 30th
AIME 2025 55.1 415 31th
LiveCodeBench 48.7 460 23th
IFEval 70.4 455 24th
TruthfulQA 67.8 417 31th
HellaSwag 76.3 423 30th
MMMU 62.2 408 32th
Arena Elo 1303.0 414 31th

FAQ

What score does Zephyr get on HumanEval?

Zephyr scores 65.9 on HumanEval in this index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the top score is 96.8.

How does Zephyr rank on HumanEval?

It ranks #432 of 600 models, in the 28th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Is Zephyr good at HumanEval?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the HumanEval score calculated?

HumanEval is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Zephyr cost?

Zephyr costs $1.61 per million input tokens and $6.84 per million output tokens.

Related