Data story · leaders

Benchmark leaders by category

The top model on each benchmark in the index, grouped by benchmark category.

What the data shows

Different models lead different benchmarks. That is the main argument against choosing a single model for every task: the leader on coding is not necessarily the leader on knowledge or preference.

The table is a map of strengths, not a single ranking.

How to read it

  • Match the benchmark category to your task.
  • Check the leader's price and context.
  • Compare the top three, not just the winner.
  • Test the leader on your own data.

Benchmark leaders

BenchmarkLeaderScoreCategory
MMLU-ProGPT-5.2 Pro91.6Knowledge
GPQA DiamondGPT-5.2 Reasoning87.0Reasoning
SWE-bench VerifiedGPT-5.2 Pro81.7Coding
HumanEvalGPT-5.2 Pro96.8Coding
MATH-500GPT-5.2 Max96.7Mathematics
AIME 2025Claude Opus 4.5 Pro91.4Mathematics
LiveCodeBenchClaude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning85.1Coding
IFEvalClaude Opus 4.5 Pro96.1Instruction following
TruthfulQAGPT-5.1 Max91.1Safety
HellaSwagGPT-5.2 Max96.1Commonsense
MMMUGPT-5.2 Max86.9Multimodal
Arena EloClaude Opus 4.5 Max1501.9Preference

Methodology

This story uses the AI & LLM Index dataset: 600 models, 40 providers and 12 benchmarks. Prices are listed per million tokens. Scores are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale and are not official benchmark results. Figures are rounded for readability.

Related

FAQ

What does the Benchmark leaders by category data show?

The top model on each benchmark in the index, grouped by benchmark category.

Are the numbers official?

No. Prices and scores are compiled for this demo index. Benchmark values are modelled estimates, not official results. Verify figures with the provider or benchmark owner before making decisions.

How should I use this ranking?

Use it to form a shortlist. Check the specific model pages, compare price and context, and test the shortlist on your own examples before committing.