Mathematics · Snowflake

Arctic Base on AIME 2025: score, rank and what it means

Arctic Base scores 62.7 on AIME 2025, placing it #368 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Score
62.7
0–100 scale
Rank
#368
of 600
Percentile
39th
within the index
Benchmark avg
63.6
all models
Leader
91.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro
Gap to leader
28.7
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on AIME 2025, with Arctic Base highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 91.4
GPT-5.2 Pro 91.0
GPT-5.1 Pro 90.6
GPT-5.2 90.6
o4 Reasoning 90.3
o4 Pro 89.9
Claude Opus 4.5 89.8
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 89.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 88.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
2 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
5 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
6 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
8 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2

What this score means

On AIME 2025, Arctic Base sits at #368 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Pro, scores 91.4, so the gap to the top is 28.7 points. The median model in this index scores 67.6, which puts Arctic Base below the midpoint.

Snowflake models average 52.6 on this benchmark. Arctic Base is 10.1 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Snowflake model.

Among open-weight models, the average is 61.8. Arctic Base is 1.0 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 62.7 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $2.27 per million input tokens, Arctic Base is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on AIME 2025. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Fusion Reasoning OpenRouter 65536 $8.59 72.2
Gemini 3 Flash Nano Google DeepMind 32768 $7.56 69.4
OLMo 2 Chat Allen Institute for AI 16384 $2.94 70.6
Firesearch Reasoning Fireworks AI 32768 $7.74 69.0
Arctic Base Snowflake 32768 $2.27 67.5
Auto Reasoning OpenRouter 65536 $8.39 71.5
Firesearch Max Fireworks AI 8192 $7.80 69.9

Other benchmarks for Arctic Base

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 69.5 401 33th
GPQA Diamond 62.0 391 35th
SWE-bench Verified 56.2 374 38th
HumanEval 71.5 383 36th
MATH-500 71.6 370 38th
LiveCodeBench 61.0 360 40th
IFEval 74.9 399 34th
TruthfulQA 71.9 381 37th
HellaSwag 79.9 379 37th
MMMU 61.6 413 31th
Arena Elo 1343.8 373 38th

FAQ

What score does Arctic Base get on AIME 2025?

Arctic Base scores 62.7 on AIME 2025 in this index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the top score is 91.4.

How does Arctic Base rank on AIME 2025?

It ranks #368 of 600 models, in the 39th percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Is Arctic Base good at AIME 2025?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the AIME 2025 score calculated?

AIME 2025 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Arctic Base cost?

Arctic Base costs $2.27 per million input tokens and $10.68 per million output tokens.

Related