Coding · Anthropic

Claude Haiku 4.5 Turbo on HumanEval: score, rank and what it means

Claude Haiku 4.5 Turbo scores 87.0 on HumanEval, placing it #86 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Score
87.0
0–100 scale
Rank
#86
of 600
Percentile
86th
within the index
Benchmark avg
74.0
all models
Leader
96.8
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
9.8
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on HumanEval, with Claude Haiku 4.5 Turbo highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 96.8
Gemini 3 Pro Pro 95.0
o4 Max 94.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 93.8
Claude Opus 4.5 93.7
GPT-5.2 Max 93.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 93.4
Grok 4 Max 93.4
GPT-5.2 Turbo 93.2
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 92.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 Gemini 3 Pro Pro Google DeepMind 200000 $19.80 87.3
3 o4 Max OpenAI 2000000 $19.51 86.2
4 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
5 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
6 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
8 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
9 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
10 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3

What this score means

On HumanEval, Claude Haiku 4.5 Turbo sits at #86 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 96.8, so the gap to the top is 9.8 points. The median model in this index scores 77.4, which puts Claude Haiku 4.5 Turbo above the midpoint.

Anthropic models average 86.0 on this benchmark. Claude Haiku 4.5 Turbo is 1.0 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Anthropic model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 82.2. Claude Haiku 4.5 Turbo is 4.8 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 87.0 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $14.37 per million input tokens, Claude Haiku 4.5 Turbo is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HumanEval. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Kimi K2 Instruct Moonshot AI 1000000 $5.80 82.3
Llama 4 Maverick Meta AI 200000 $5.36 81.6
Kimi K1.5 Moonshot AI 128000 $5.19 80.7
Kimi K2 Moonshot AI 128000 $5.85 83.0
Claude Haiku 4.5 Turbo Anthropic 200000 $14.37 80.0
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Vision Anthropic 128000 $16.99 83.8
Gemini 2.5 Pro Max Google DeepMind 200000 $16.94 84.8

Other benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 Turbo

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 80.6 161 73th
GPQA Diamond 75.1 140 77th
SWE-bench Verified 68.4 135 78th
MATH-500 83.7 132 78th
AIME 2025 79.2 98 84th
LiveCodeBench 71.7 153 75th
IFEval 87.1 128 79th
TruthfulQA 81.0 155 74th
HellaSwag 88.1 136 77th
MMMU 77.7 101 83th
Arena Elo 1434.5 109 82th

FAQ

What score does Claude Haiku 4.5 Turbo get on HumanEval?

Claude Haiku 4.5 Turbo scores 87.0 on HumanEval in this index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the top score is 96.8.

How does Claude Haiku 4.5 Turbo rank on HumanEval?

It ranks #86 of 600 models, in the 86th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 Turbo good at HumanEval?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the HumanEval score calculated?

HumanEval is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Claude Haiku 4.5 Turbo cost?

Claude Haiku 4.5 Turbo costs $14.37 per million input tokens and $54.76 per million output tokens.

Related