Mathematics · Anthropic

Claude Haiku 4.5 Turbo on MATH-500: score, rank and what it means

Claude Haiku 4.5 Turbo scores 83.7 on MATH-500, placing it #132 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 72.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.7.

Score
83.7
0–100 scale
Rank
#132
of 600
Percentile
78th
within the index
Benchmark avg
72.5
all models
Leader
96.7
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
13.0
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MATH-500, with Claude Haiku 4.5 Turbo highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 96.7
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 95.9
GPT-5.1 Pro 95.1
o4 Reasoning 94.8
Grok 4 Max 94.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 94.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 94.2
Claude Opus 4.5 93.7
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 93.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo 93.2

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
5 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
6 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
9 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo Anthropic 2000000 $19.57 85.7

What this score means

On MATH-500, Claude Haiku 4.5 Turbo sits at #132 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 96.7, so the gap to the top is 13.0 points. The median model in this index scores 76.0, which puts Claude Haiku 4.5 Turbo above the midpoint.

Anthropic models average 85.3 on this benchmark. Claude Haiku 4.5 Turbo is 1.6 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Anthropic model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 81.3. Claude Haiku 4.5 Turbo is 2.4 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 83.7 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $14.37 per million input tokens, Claude Haiku 4.5 Turbo is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MATH-500. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Magistral Chat Mistral AI 128000 $4.33 76.8
Nova Pro Max Amazon 1000000 $14.05 81.2
Reka Core Reka AI 32768 $12.17 77.4
Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro Anthropic 1000000 $15.07 80.8
Claude Haiku 4.5 Turbo Anthropic 200000 $14.37 80.0
DeepSeek-V3.2 Base DeepSeek 128000 $5.05 80.2
Hunyuan-Turbo Max Tencent 128000 $12.40 78.3

Other benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 Turbo

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 80.6 161 73th
GPQA Diamond 75.1 140 77th
SWE-bench Verified 68.4 135 78th
HumanEval 87.0 86 86th
AIME 2025 79.2 98 84th
LiveCodeBench 71.7 153 75th
IFEval 87.1 128 79th
TruthfulQA 81.0 155 74th
HellaSwag 88.1 136 77th
MMMU 77.7 101 83th
Arena Elo 1434.5 109 82th

FAQ

What score does Claude Haiku 4.5 Turbo get on MATH-500?

Claude Haiku 4.5 Turbo scores 83.7 on MATH-500 in this index. The benchmark average is 72.5 and the top score is 96.7.

How does Claude Haiku 4.5 Turbo rank on MATH-500?

It ranks #132 of 600 models, in the 78th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.7.

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 Turbo good at MATH-500?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MATH-500 score calculated?

MATH-500 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Claude Haiku 4.5 Turbo cost?

Claude Haiku 4.5 Turbo costs $14.37 per million input tokens and $54.76 per million output tokens.

Related