Instruction following · Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5 on IFEval: score, rank and what it means

Claude Opus 4.5 scores 92.5 on IFEval, placing it #29 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 78.6 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 96.1.

Score
92.5
0–100 scale
Rank
#29
of 600
Percentile
95th
within the index
Benchmark avg
78.6
all models
Leader
96.1
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro
Gap to leader
3.6
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on IFEval, with Claude Opus 4.5 highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 96.1
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 95.9
GPT-5.2 Pro 95.6
GPT-5.2 Max 95.2
GPT-5.2 Reasoning 95.0
GPT-5.1 Pro 94.8
Gemini 3 Pro Max 94.7
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 94.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 94.5
o4 Reasoning 94.5

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
2 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
3 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
4 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
5 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
6 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
7 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
8 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5

What this score means

On IFEval, Claude Opus 4.5 sits at #29 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Pro, scores 96.1, so the gap to the top is 3.6 points. The median model in this index scores 81.2, which puts Claude Opus 4.5 above the midpoint.

Anthropic models average 88.3 on this benchmark. Claude Opus 4.5 is 4.2 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Anthropic model.

Among frontier models, the average is 92.0. Claude Opus 4.5 is 0.5 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 92.5 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $19.42 per million input tokens, Claude Opus 4.5 is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on IFEval. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Gemini 3 Pro Pro Google DeepMind 200000 $19.80 87.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Vision Anthropic 200000 $17.70 85.9
Grok 3 Max xAI 2000000 $17.66 85.9
o4 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.34 86.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
Qwen3-Max Alibaba Cloud 400000 $17.37 84.4

Other benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.5

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 87.0 33 95th
GPQA Diamond 81.7 34 94th
SWE-bench Verified 77.1 22 96th
HumanEval 93.7 5 99th
MATH-500 93.7 8 99th
AIME 2025 89.8 7 99th
LiveCodeBench 85.0 3 100th
TruthfulQA 88.1 20 97th
HellaSwag 92.4 35 94th
MMMU 84.2 12 98th
Arena Elo 1491.2 8 99th

FAQ

What score does Claude Opus 4.5 get on IFEval?

Claude Opus 4.5 scores 92.5 on IFEval in this index. The benchmark average is 78.6 and the top score is 96.1.

How does Claude Opus 4.5 rank on IFEval?

It ranks #29 of 600 models, in the 95th percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 96.1.

Is Claude Opus 4.5 good at IFEval?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the IFEval score calculated?

IFEval is a instruction following benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Claude Opus 4.5 cost?

Claude Opus 4.5 costs $19.42 per million input tokens and $75.27 per million output tokens.

Related