Safety · Cohere

Command R+ 1.5B on TruthfulQA: score, rank and what it means

Command R+ 1.5B scores 56.8 on TruthfulQA, placing it #553 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 73.6 and the leader is GPT-5.1 Max at 91.1.

Score
56.8
0–100 scale
Rank
#553
of 600
Percentile
8th
within the index
Benchmark avg
73.6
all models
Leader
91.1
GPT-5.1 Max
Gap to leader
34.3
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on TruthfulQA, with Command R+ 1.5B highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.1 Max 91.1
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 90.3
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 90.0
GPT-5.2 Pro 90.0
GPT-5.2 89.7
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 89.4
Qwen3-Max Max 89.3
GPT-5.1 89.2
GPT-5.1 Turbo 89.2

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
2 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
3 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
4 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
5 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
6 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
7 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
8 Qwen3-Max Max Alibaba Cloud 400000 $18.53 85.9
9 GPT-5.1 OpenAI 2000000 $19.01 86.0
10 GPT-5.1 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.19 86.1

What this score means

On TruthfulQA, Command R+ 1.5B sits at #553 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.1 Max, scores 91.1, so the gap to the top is 34.3 points. The median model in this index scores 76.3, which puts Command R+ 1.5B below the midpoint.

Cohere models average 71.9 on this benchmark. Command R+ 1.5B is 15.1 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Cohere model.

Among small open-weight models, the average is 59.9. Command R+ 1.5B is 3.1 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 56.8 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $0.51 per million input tokens, Command R+ 1.5B is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on TruthfulQA. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Kimi K1.5 1.5B Moonshot AI 4096 $0.75 53.2
DeepSeek-Coder 1.5B DeepSeek 16384 $0.58 51.0
QwQ 1.5B Alibaba Cloud 32768 $0.61 51.6
Llama 3 Baseten 1.5B Baseten 4096 $0.42 48.2
Command R+ 1.5B Cohere 32768 $0.51 50.0
Llama 3 Anyscale 1.5B Anyscale 16384 $0.43 48.9
Hunyuan-Large 1.5B Tencent 8192 $0.54 50.5

Other benchmarks for Command R+ 1.5B

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 56.4 565 6th
GPQA Diamond 44.1 571 5th
SWE-bench Verified 34.5 562 6th
HumanEval 52.9 556 7th
MATH-500 52.0 539 10th
AIME 2025 35.1 568 5th
LiveCodeBench 35.8 562 6th
IFEval 64.0 539 10th
HellaSwag 67.0 561 7th
MMMU 51.7 535 11th
Arena Elo 1193.9 560 7th

FAQ

What score does Command R+ 1.5B get on TruthfulQA?

Command R+ 1.5B scores 56.8 on TruthfulQA in this index. The benchmark average is 73.6 and the top score is 91.1.

How does Command R+ 1.5B rank on TruthfulQA?

It ranks #553 of 600 models, in the 8th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.1 Max at 91.1.

Is Command R+ 1.5B good at TruthfulQA?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the TruthfulQA score calculated?

TruthfulQA is a safety benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Command R+ 1.5B cost?

Command R+ 1.5B costs $0.51 per million input tokens and $2.35 per million output tokens.

Related