Safety · Cohere

Command R+ Instruct on TruthfulQA: score, rank and what it means

Command R+ Instruct scores 78.3 on TruthfulQA, placing it #243 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 73.6 and the leader is GPT-5.1 Max at 91.1.

Score
78.3
0–100 scale
Rank
#243
of 600
Percentile
60th
within the index
Benchmark avg
73.6
all models
Leader
91.1
GPT-5.1 Max
Gap to leader
12.8
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on TruthfulQA, with Command R+ Instruct highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.1 Max 91.1
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 90.3
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 90.0
GPT-5.2 Pro 90.0
GPT-5.2 89.7
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 89.4
Qwen3-Max Max 89.3
GPT-5.1 89.2
GPT-5.1 Turbo 89.2

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
2 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
3 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
4 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
5 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
6 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
7 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
8 Qwen3-Max Max Alibaba Cloud 400000 $18.53 85.9
9 GPT-5.1 OpenAI 2000000 $19.01 86.0
10 GPT-5.1 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.19 86.1

What this score means

On TruthfulQA, Command R+ Instruct sits at #243 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.1 Max, scores 91.1, so the gap to the top is 12.8 points. The median model in this index scores 76.3, which puts Command R+ Instruct above the midpoint.

Cohere models average 71.9 on this benchmark. Command R+ Instruct is 6.4 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Cohere model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 80.1. Command R+ Instruct is 1.8 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 78.3 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $4.16 per million input tokens, Command R+ Instruct is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on TruthfulQA. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Gemini 2.5 Pro Mini Google DeepMind 128000 $10.07 74.2
Llama 3.1 Meta AI 200000 $4.16 76.3
Llama 3.1 Cerebras Chat Cerebras 32768 $4.07 76.0
Yi-Large Chat 01.AI 65536 $3.49 73.5
Command R+ Instruct Cohere 200000 $4.16 76.2
Llama 3 DeepInfra Chat DeepInfra 200000 $3.74 75.0
Llama 3 Lambda Lambda 65536 $3.90 75.6

Other benchmarks for Command R+ Instruct

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 79.8 187 69th
GPQA Diamond 70.5 250 58th
SWE-bench Verified 67.5 155 74th
HumanEval 81.2 208 65th
MATH-500 82.2 159 74th
AIME 2025 69.3 271 55th
LiveCodeBench 67.6 233 61th
IFEval 85.5 172 71th
HellaSwag 84.8 254 58th
MMMU 71.8 249 59th
Arena Elo 1395.7 223 63th

FAQ

What score does Command R+ Instruct get on TruthfulQA?

Command R+ Instruct scores 78.3 on TruthfulQA in this index. The benchmark average is 73.6 and the top score is 91.1.

How does Command R+ Instruct rank on TruthfulQA?

It ranks #243 of 600 models, in the 60th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.1 Max at 91.1.

Is Command R+ Instruct good at TruthfulQA?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the TruthfulQA score calculated?

TruthfulQA is a safety benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Command R+ Instruct cost?

Command R+ Instruct costs $4.16 per million input tokens and $17.58 per million output tokens.

Related