Multimodal · Cohere

Embed 4 Nano on MMMU: score, rank and what it means

Embed 4 Nano scores 46.2 on MMMU, placing it #578 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Score
46.2
0–100 scale
Rank
#578
of 600
Percentile
4th
within the index
Benchmark avg
67.1
all models
Leader
86.9
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
40.7
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MMMU, with Embed 4 Nano highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 86.9
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 86.2
GPT-5.2 85.3
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.1 Max 85.1
Grok 4 Pro 84.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 84.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro 84.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 84.4
GPT-5.2 Vision 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
5 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
6 Grok 4 Pro xAI 1000000 $19.00 85.4
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
8 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro Anthropic 1000000 $18.73 86.7
9 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
10 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4

What this score means

On MMMU, Embed 4 Nano sits at #578 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 86.9, so the gap to the top is 40.7 points. The median model in this index scores 70.0, which puts Embed 4 Nano below the midpoint.

Cohere models average 65.1 on this benchmark. Embed 4 Nano is 18.9 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Cohere model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 65.0. Embed 4 Nano is 18.8 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 46.2 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $1.48 per million input tokens, Embed 4 Nano is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMMU. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Llama 3 Novita 1.5B Novita AI 4096 $0.41 49.1
Nemotron Nano 7B NVIDIA 8192 $0.35 47.5
Llama 3 DeepInfra 1.5B DeepInfra 32768 $0.48 48.8
OLMo 2 1.5B Allen Institute for AI 16384 $0.28 44.0
Embed 4 Nano Cohere 8192 $1.48 49.7
Nemotron Nano 8B NVIDIA 8192 $0.46 48.1
Phi-4 1.5B Microsoft 8192 $0.42 48.1

Other benchmarks for Embed 4 Nano

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 54.5 575 4th
GPQA Diamond 45.6 560 7th
SWE-bench Verified 33.1 571 5th
HumanEval 55.2 540 10th
MATH-500 52.4 537 11th
AIME 2025 33.5 575 4th
LiveCodeBench 40.3 535 11th
IFEval 61.0 564 6th
TruthfulQA 55.6 570 5th
HellaSwag 69.8 537 11th
Arena Elo 1207.9 547 9th

FAQ

What score does Embed 4 Nano get on MMMU?

Embed 4 Nano scores 46.2 on MMMU in this index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the top score is 86.9.

How does Embed 4 Nano rank on MMMU?

It ranks #578 of 600 models, in the 4th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Is Embed 4 Nano good at MMMU?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MMMU score calculated?

MMMU is a multimodal benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Embed 4 Nano cost?

Embed 4 Nano costs $1.48 per million input tokens and $6.14 per million output tokens.

Related