Mathematics · Cohere

Embed 4 Reasoning on AIME 2025: score, rank and what it means

Embed 4 Reasoning scores 57.9 on AIME 2025, placing it #400 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Score
57.9
0–100 scale
Rank
#400
of 600
Percentile
33th
within the index
Benchmark avg
63.6
all models
Leader
91.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro
Gap to leader
33.5
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on AIME 2025, with Embed 4 Reasoning highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 91.4
GPT-5.2 Pro 91.0
GPT-5.1 Pro 90.6
GPT-5.2 90.6
o4 Reasoning 90.3
o4 Pro 89.9
Claude Opus 4.5 89.8
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 89.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 88.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
2 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
5 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
6 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
8 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2

What this score means

On AIME 2025, Embed 4 Reasoning sits at #400 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Pro, scores 91.4, so the gap to the top is 33.5 points. The median model in this index scores 67.6, which puts Embed 4 Reasoning below the midpoint.

Cohere models average 60.6 on this benchmark. Embed 4 Reasoning is 2.7 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Cohere model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 60.1. Embed 4 Reasoning is 2.2 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 57.9 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $5.50 per million input tokens, Embed 4 Reasoning is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on AIME 2025. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Nemotron Nano Instruct NVIDIA 32768 $2.33 67.4
DeepSeek-R1 8B DeepSeek 16384 $1.87 64.3
Molmo Base Allen Institute for AI 4096 $2.02 65.0
Molmo Chat Allen Institute for AI 32768 $2.40 66.7
Embed 4 Reasoning Cohere 4096 $5.50 65.3
ERNIE 4.5 Nano Baidu 32768 $6.01 65.6
Nova Pro Nano Amazon 8192 $5.44 65.4

Other benchmarks for Embed 4 Reasoning

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 70.1 395 34th
GPQA Diamond 62.8 385 36th
SWE-bench Verified 49.2 427 29th
HumanEval 68.9 409 32th
MATH-500 67.1 406 32th
LiveCodeBench 56.1 396 34th
IFEval 76.0 389 35th
TruthfulQA 70.4 396 34th
HellaSwag 76.5 420 30th
MMMU 62.8 400 33th
Arena Elo 1310.3 408 32th

FAQ

What score does Embed 4 Reasoning get on AIME 2025?

Embed 4 Reasoning scores 57.9 on AIME 2025 in this index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the top score is 91.4.

How does Embed 4 Reasoning rank on AIME 2025?

It ranks #400 of 600 models, in the 33rd percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Is Embed 4 Reasoning good at AIME 2025?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the AIME 2025 score calculated?

AIME 2025 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Embed 4 Reasoning cost?

Embed 4 Reasoning costs $5.50 per million input tokens and $26.10 per million output tokens.

Related