Multimodal · Cohere

Embed 4 on MMMU: score, rank and what it means

Embed 4 scores 58.2 on MMMU, placing it #455 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Score
58.2
0–100 scale
Rank
#455
of 600
Percentile
24th
within the index
Benchmark avg
67.1
all models
Leader
86.9
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
28.7
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MMMU, with Embed 4 highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 86.9
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 86.2
GPT-5.2 85.3
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.1 Max 85.1
Grok 4 Pro 84.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 84.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro 84.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 84.4
GPT-5.2 Vision 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
5 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
6 Grok 4 Pro xAI 1000000 $19.00 85.4
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
8 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro Anthropic 1000000 $18.73 86.7
9 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
10 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4

What this score means

On MMMU, Embed 4 sits at #455 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 86.9, so the gap to the top is 28.7 points. The median model in this index scores 70.0, which puts Embed 4 below the midpoint.

Cohere models average 65.1 on this benchmark. Embed 4 is 6.9 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Cohere model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 65.0. Embed 4 is 6.8 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 58.2 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $4.79 per million input tokens, Embed 4 is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMMU. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
MiniMax-Text 8B MiniMax 4096 $1.22 59.5
Llama 3.1 Turbo 8B Together AI 32768 $1.16 58.8
Mistral Small 3 8B Mistral AI 8192 $0.99 57.2
SmolLM3 Hugging Face 8192 $1.71 63.1
Embed 4 Cohere 32768 $4.79 63.8
GLM-4.6 7B Zhipu AI 16384 $1.52 61.8
Llama 4 Scout 8B Meta AI 8192 $1.46 61.2

Other benchmarks for Embed 4

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 67.9 419 30th
GPQA Diamond 61.6 393 35th
SWE-bench Verified 51.7 408 32th
HumanEval 69.3 406 32th
MATH-500 66.0 412 31th
AIME 2025 54.1 422 30th
LiveCodeBench 54.3 411 32th
IFEval 73.5 410 32th
TruthfulQA 69.9 401 33th
HellaSwag 75.3 436 27th
Arena Elo 1286.4 437 27th

FAQ

What score does Embed 4 get on MMMU?

Embed 4 scores 58.2 on MMMU in this index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the top score is 86.9.

How does Embed 4 rank on MMMU?

It ranks #455 of 600 models, in the 24th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Is Embed 4 good at MMMU?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MMMU score calculated?

MMMU is a multimodal benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Embed 4 cost?

Embed 4 costs $4.79 per million input tokens and $20.86 per million output tokens.

Related