Commonsense · Baidu

ERNIE 4.0 Turbo on HellaSwag: score, rank and what it means

ERNIE 4.0 Turbo scores 87.0 on HellaSwag, placing it #176 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 81.4 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.1.

Score
87.0
0–100 scale
Rank
#176
of 600
Percentile
71th
within the index
Benchmark avg
81.4
all models
Leader
96.1
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
9.1
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on HellaSwag, with ERNIE 4.0 Turbo highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 96.1
GPT-5.2 Turbo 95.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 95.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 95.2
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 95.2
Grok 4 Reasoning 95.2
GPT-5.2 Vision 94.6
Gemini 3 Pro Turbo 94.6
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 94.4
o4 Pro 94.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
3 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
4 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
6 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
7 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4
8 Gemini 3 Pro Turbo Google DeepMind 400000 $19.62 86.4
9 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
10 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3

What this score means

On HellaSwag, ERNIE 4.0 Turbo sits at #176 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 96.1, so the gap to the top is 9.1 points. The median model in this index scores 83.6, which puts ERNIE 4.0 Turbo above the midpoint.

Baidu models average 85.3 on this benchmark. ERNIE 4.0 Turbo is 1.7 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Baidu model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 86.8. ERNIE 4.0 Turbo is 0.2 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 87.0 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $12.00 per million input tokens, ERNIE 4.0 Turbo is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HellaSwag. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Grok 4 Mini xAI 65536 $12.21 77.9
Llama 3.3 Chat Meta AI 32768 $4.18 76.9
Mistral Large 3 Chat Mistral AI 1000000 $4.90 79.1
Reka Core Reka AI 32768 $12.17 77.4
ERNIE 4.0 Turbo Baidu 65536 $12.00 78.0
ERNIE 4.5 Turbo Baidu 128000 $13.75 79.7
Llama 3 Lambda Instruct Lambda 32768 $3.92 75.8

Other benchmarks for ERNIE 4.0 Turbo

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 80.5 168 72th
GPQA Diamond 76.2 115 81th
SWE-bench Verified 64.7 217 64th
HumanEval 82.6 168 72th
MATH-500 82.0 167 72th
AIME 2025 72.6 207 66th
LiveCodeBench 71.9 147 76th
IFEval 85.2 182 70th
TruthfulQA 79.0 216 64th
MMMU 76.8 115 81th
Arena Elo 1422.9 134 78th

FAQ

What score does ERNIE 4.0 Turbo get on HellaSwag?

ERNIE 4.0 Turbo scores 87.0 on HellaSwag in this index. The benchmark average is 81.4 and the top score is 96.1.

How does ERNIE 4.0 Turbo rank on HellaSwag?

It ranks #176 of 600 models, in the 71st percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.1.

Is ERNIE 4.0 Turbo good at HellaSwag?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the HellaSwag score calculated?

HellaSwag is a commonsense benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does ERNIE 4.0 Turbo cost?

ERNIE 4.0 Turbo costs $12.00 per million input tokens and $55.04 per million output tokens.

Related