Mathematics · Baidu

ERNIE 4.5 Nano on AIME 2025: score, rank and what it means

ERNIE 4.5 Nano scores 57.8 on AIME 2025, placing it #401 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Score
57.8
0–100 scale
Rank
#401
of 600
Percentile
33th
within the index
Benchmark avg
63.6
all models
Leader
91.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro
Gap to leader
33.6
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on AIME 2025, with ERNIE 4.5 Nano highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 91.4
GPT-5.2 Pro 91.0
GPT-5.1 Pro 90.6
GPT-5.2 90.6
o4 Reasoning 90.3
o4 Pro 89.9
Claude Opus 4.5 89.8
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 89.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 88.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
2 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
5 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
6 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
8 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2

What this score means

On AIME 2025, ERNIE 4.5 Nano sits at #401 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Pro, scores 91.4, so the gap to the top is 33.6 points. The median model in this index scores 67.6, which puts ERNIE 4.5 Nano below the midpoint.

Baidu models average 71.5 on this benchmark. ERNIE 4.5 Nano is 13.7 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Baidu model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 60.1. ERNIE 4.5 Nano is 2.3 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 57.8 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $6.01 per million input tokens, ERNIE 4.5 Nano is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on AIME 2025. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
DeepSeek-R1 8B DeepSeek 16384 $1.87 64.3
Molmo Base Allen Institute for AI 4096 $2.02 65.0
Molmo Chat Allen Institute for AI 32768 $2.40 66.7
Embed 4 Reasoning Cohere 4096 $5.50 65.3
ERNIE 4.5 Nano Baidu 32768 $6.01 65.6
Nova Pro Nano Amazon 8192 $5.44 65.4
Command A Nano Cohere 8192 $5.90 66.3

Other benchmarks for ERNIE 4.5 Nano

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 69.7 399 34th
GPQA Diamond 60.0 405 33th
SWE-bench Verified 56.2 375 38th
HumanEval 69.4 405 33th
MATH-500 68.1 399 34th
LiveCodeBench 55.5 400 33th
IFEval 76.8 379 37th
TruthfulQA 68.9 405 33th
HellaSwag 77.4 410 32th
MMMU 61.5 416 31th
Arena Elo 1310.0 409 32th

FAQ

What score does ERNIE 4.5 Nano get on AIME 2025?

ERNIE 4.5 Nano scores 57.8 on AIME 2025 in this index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the top score is 91.4.

How does ERNIE 4.5 Nano rank on AIME 2025?

It ranks #401 of 600 models, in the 33rd percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Is ERNIE 4.5 Nano good at AIME 2025?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the AIME 2025 score calculated?

AIME 2025 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does ERNIE 4.5 Nano cost?

ERNIE 4.5 Nano costs $6.01 per million input tokens and $22.92 per million output tokens.

Related