Mathematics · Baidu

ERNIE 4.5 on AIME 2025: score, rank and what it means

ERNIE 4.5 scores 75.9 on AIME 2025, placing it #142 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Score
75.9
0–100 scale
Rank
#142
of 600
Percentile
76th
within the index
Benchmark avg
63.6
all models
Leader
91.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro
Gap to leader
15.5
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on AIME 2025, with ERNIE 4.5 highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 91.4
GPT-5.2 Pro 91.0
GPT-5.1 Pro 90.6
GPT-5.2 90.6
o4 Reasoning 90.3
o4 Pro 89.9
Claude Opus 4.5 89.8
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 89.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 88.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
2 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
5 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
6 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
8 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2

What this score means

On AIME 2025, ERNIE 4.5 sits at #142 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Pro, scores 91.4, so the gap to the top is 15.5 points. The median model in this index scores 67.6, which puts ERNIE 4.5 above the midpoint.

Baidu models average 71.5 on this benchmark. ERNIE 4.5 is 4.4 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Baidu model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 73.9. ERNIE 4.5 is 2.0 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 75.9 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $13.44 per million input tokens, ERNIE 4.5 is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on AIME 2025. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Claude Opus 4.5 Mini Anthropic 65536 $12.72 79.0
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google DeepMind 200000 $15.20 81.6
QwQ Chat Alibaba Cloud 65536 $4.28 78.2
GLM-4.5 Zhipu AI 200000 $4.55 78.2
ERNIE 4.5 Baidu 65536 $13.44 80.0
Reka Core Reasoning Reka AI 32768 $13.11 78.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 Vision Anthropic 128000 $13.01 79.2

Other benchmarks for ERNIE 4.5

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 83.7 86 86th
GPQA Diamond 77.2 102 83th
SWE-bench Verified 68.2 140 77th
HumanEval 83.9 134 78th
MATH-500 81.3 181 70th
LiveCodeBench 72.9 131 78th
IFEval 86.4 146 76th
TruthfulQA 83.0 106 82th
HellaSwag 89.2 108 82th
MMMU 78.0 97 84th
Arena Elo 1414.8 168 72th

FAQ

What score does ERNIE 4.5 get on AIME 2025?

ERNIE 4.5 scores 75.9 on AIME 2025 in this index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the top score is 91.4.

How does ERNIE 4.5 rank on AIME 2025?

It ranks #142 of 600 models, in the 76th percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Is ERNIE 4.5 good at AIME 2025?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the AIME 2025 score calculated?

AIME 2025 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does ERNIE 4.5 cost?

ERNIE 4.5 costs $13.44 per million input tokens and $56.59 per million output tokens.

Related