Commonsense · Baidu

ERNIE 4.5 on HellaSwag: score, rank and what it means

ERNIE 4.5 scores 89.2 on HellaSwag, placing it #108 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 81.4 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.1.

Score
89.2
0–100 scale
Rank
#108
of 600
Percentile
82th
within the index
Benchmark avg
81.4
all models
Leader
96.1
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
6.9
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on HellaSwag, with ERNIE 4.5 highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 96.1
GPT-5.2 Turbo 95.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 95.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 95.2
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 95.2
Grok 4 Reasoning 95.2
GPT-5.2 Vision 94.6
Gemini 3 Pro Turbo 94.6
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 94.4
o4 Pro 94.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
3 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
4 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
6 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
7 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4
8 Gemini 3 Pro Turbo Google DeepMind 400000 $19.62 86.4
9 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
10 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3

What this score means

On HellaSwag, ERNIE 4.5 sits at #108 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 96.1, so the gap to the top is 6.9 points. The median model in this index scores 83.6, which puts ERNIE 4.5 above the midpoint.

Baidu models average 85.3 on this benchmark. ERNIE 4.5 is 3.9 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Baidu model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 86.8. ERNIE 4.5 is 2.4 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 89.2 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $13.44 per million input tokens, ERNIE 4.5 is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HellaSwag. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Qwen3-Coder Instruct Alibaba Cloud 128000 $4.66 78.1
Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro Anthropic 1000000 $15.07 80.8
Sonar Pro Turbo Perplexity 128000 $13.55 79.0
DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat DeepSeek 1000000 $5.80 82.5
ERNIE 4.5 Baidu 65536 $13.44 80.0
Llama 4 Maverick Base Meta AI 128000 $4.68 79.1
Mistral Large 3 Instruct Mistral AI 400000 $5.31 81.1

Other benchmarks for ERNIE 4.5

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 83.7 86 86th
GPQA Diamond 77.2 102 83th
SWE-bench Verified 68.2 140 77th
HumanEval 83.9 134 78th
MATH-500 81.3 181 70th
AIME 2025 75.9 142 76th
LiveCodeBench 72.9 131 78th
IFEval 86.4 146 76th
TruthfulQA 83.0 106 82th
MMMU 78.0 97 84th
Arena Elo 1414.8 168 72th

FAQ

What score does ERNIE 4.5 get on HellaSwag?

ERNIE 4.5 scores 89.2 on HellaSwag in this index. The benchmark average is 81.4 and the top score is 96.1.

How does ERNIE 4.5 rank on HellaSwag?

It ranks #108 of 600 models, in the 82nd percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.1.

Is ERNIE 4.5 good at HellaSwag?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the HellaSwag score calculated?

HellaSwag is a commonsense benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does ERNIE 4.5 cost?

ERNIE 4.5 costs $13.44 per million input tokens and $56.59 per million output tokens.

Related