Firesearch Nano on HumanEval: score, rank and what it means
Firesearch Nano scores 58.9 on HumanEval, placing it #513 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.
Score distribution
The chart shows the top 10 models on HumanEval, with Firesearch Nano highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.
Top 10 leaderboard
| # | Model | Provider | Context | Input / 1M | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5.2 Pro | OpenAI | 2000000 | $21.32 | 89.6 |
| 2 | Gemini 3 Pro Pro | Google DeepMind | 200000 | $19.80 | 87.3 |
| 3 | o4 Max | OpenAI | 2000000 | $19.51 | 86.2 |
| 4 | Grok 4 Reasoning | xAI | 2000000 | $19.67 | 87.8 |
| 5 | Claude Opus 4.5 | Anthropic | 400000 | $19.42 | 87.7 |
| 6 | GPT-5.2 Max | OpenAI | 1000000 | $21.39 | 89.2 |
| 7 | Claude Opus 4.5 Pro | Anthropic | 200000 | $20.98 | 89.1 |
| 8 | Grok 4 Max | xAI | 2000000 | $19.70 | 86.6 |
| 9 | GPT-5.2 Turbo | OpenAI | 1000000 | $20.73 | 87.4 |
| 10 | GPT-5.1 Reasoning | OpenAI | 400000 | $20.27 | 88.3 |
What this score means
On HumanEval, Firesearch Nano sits at #513 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 96.8, so the gap to the top is 37.9 points. The median model in this index scores 77.4, which puts Firesearch Nano below the midpoint.
Fireworks AI models average 71.5 on this benchmark. Firesearch Nano is 12.6 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Fireworks AI model.
Among mid-range models, the average is 71.5. Firesearch Nano is 12.6 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.
Read a 58.9 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.
Price context
At $2.49 per million input tokens, Firesearch Nano is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HumanEval. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.
| Model | Provider | Context | Input / 1M | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pythia Base | EleutherAI | 16384 | $0.99 | 55.9 |
| Llama 3 Novita 8B | Novita AI | 16384 | $0.99 | 55.5 |
| Llama 3 Anyscale 8B | Anyscale | 32768 | $0.97 | 57.3 |
| Llama 3.1 Turbo 7B | Together AI | 8192 | $0.98 | 56.4 |
| Firesearch Nano | Fireworks AI | 8192 | $2.49 | 55.6 |
| Llama 3 Modal 7B | Modal | 4096 | $0.88 | 55.2 |
| Command R+ 7B | Cohere | 8192 | $0.95 | 56.2 |
Other benchmarks for Firesearch Nano
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Percentile | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 63.0 | 488 | 19th | |
| GPQA Diamond | 52.6 | 493 | 18th | |
| SWE-bench Verified | 40.0 | 521 | 13th | |
| MATH-500 | 52.9 | 533 | 11th | |
| AIME 2025 | 45.7 | 492 | 18th | |
| LiveCodeBench | 41.5 | 529 | 12th | |
| IFEval | 66.5 | 509 | 15th | |
| TruthfulQA | 62.6 | 495 | 18th | |
| HellaSwag | 73.2 | 475 | 21th | |
| MMMU | 54.8 | 500 | 17th | |
| Arena Elo | 1229.9 | 526 | 12th |
FAQ
What score does Firesearch Nano get on HumanEval?
Firesearch Nano scores 58.9 on HumanEval in this index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the top score is 96.8.
How does Firesearch Nano rank on HumanEval?
It ranks #513 of 600 models, in the 15th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.
Is Firesearch Nano good at HumanEval?
It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.
How is the HumanEval score calculated?
HumanEval is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.
What does Firesearch Nano cost?
Firesearch Nano costs $2.49 per million input tokens and $11.16 per million output tokens.