Coding · Fireworks AI

Firesearch Nano on SWE-bench Verified: score, rank and what it means

Firesearch Nano scores 40.0 on SWE-bench Verified, placing it #521 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 57.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 81.7.

Score
40.0
0–100 scale
Rank
#521
of 600
Percentile
13th
within the index
Benchmark avg
57.5
all models
Leader
81.7
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
41.7
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on SWE-bench Verified, with Firesearch Nano highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 81.7
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 81.1
GPT-5.2 Max 80.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max 80.2
GPT-5.2 80.2
GPT-5.1 Pro 80.1
o4 Max 79.8
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 79.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 79.5
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 79.5

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
3 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $19.90 87.2
5 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
6 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
7 o4 Max OpenAI 2000000 $19.51 86.2
8 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2

What this score means

On SWE-bench Verified, Firesearch Nano sits at #521 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 81.7, so the gap to the top is 41.7 points. The median model in this index scores 61.0, which puts Firesearch Nano below the midpoint.

Fireworks AI models average 55.4 on this benchmark. Firesearch Nano is 15.4 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Fireworks AI model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 54.9. Firesearch Nano is 14.9 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 40.0 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $2.49 per million input tokens, Firesearch Nano is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on SWE-bench Verified. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Llama 4 Maverick 1.5B Meta AI 8192 $0.93 55.2
Yi-Large 8B 01.AI 32768 $0.88 56.1
Magistral 1.5B Mistral AI 4096 $0.67 52.7
Llama 3 Novita 8B Novita AI 16384 $0.99 55.5
Firesearch Nano Fireworks AI 8192 $2.49 55.6
Kimi K2 1.5B Moonshot AI 4096 $0.99 56.8
Phi-4 8B Microsoft 32768 $0.96 54.9

Other benchmarks for Firesearch Nano

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 63.0 488 19th
GPQA Diamond 52.6 493 18th
HumanEval 58.9 513 15th
MATH-500 52.9 533 11th
AIME 2025 45.7 492 18th
LiveCodeBench 41.5 529 12th
IFEval 66.5 509 15th
TruthfulQA 62.6 495 18th
HellaSwag 73.2 475 21th
MMMU 54.8 500 17th
Arena Elo 1229.9 526 12th

FAQ

What score does Firesearch Nano get on SWE-bench Verified?

Firesearch Nano scores 40.0 on SWE-bench Verified in this index. The benchmark average is 57.5 and the top score is 81.7.

How does Firesearch Nano rank on SWE-bench Verified?

It ranks #521 of 600 models, in the 13th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 81.7.

Is Firesearch Nano good at SWE-bench Verified?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the SWE-bench Verified score calculated?

SWE-bench Verified is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Firesearch Nano cost?

Firesearch Nano costs $2.49 per million input tokens and $11.16 per million output tokens.

Related