Commonsense · OpenRouter

Fusion Reasoning on HellaSwag: score, rank and what it means

Fusion Reasoning scores 84.1 on HellaSwag, placing it #274 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 81.4 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.1.

Score
84.1
0–100 scale
Rank
#274
of 600
Percentile
54th
within the index
Benchmark avg
81.4
all models
Leader
96.1
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
12.0
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on HellaSwag, with Fusion Reasoning highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 96.1
GPT-5.2 Turbo 95.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 95.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 95.2
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 95.2
Grok 4 Reasoning 95.2
GPT-5.2 Vision 94.6
Gemini 3 Pro Turbo 94.6
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 94.4
o4 Pro 94.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
3 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
4 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
6 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
7 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4
8 Gemini 3 Pro Turbo Google DeepMind 400000 $19.62 86.4
9 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
10 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3

What this score means

On HellaSwag, Fusion Reasoning sits at #274 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 96.1, so the gap to the top is 12.0 points. The median model in this index scores 83.6, which puts Fusion Reasoning above the midpoint.

OpenRouter models average 80.2 on this benchmark. Fusion Reasoning is 3.9 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average OpenRouter model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 79.8. Fusion Reasoning is 4.3 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 84.1 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $8.59 per million input tokens, Fusion Reasoning is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HellaSwag. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Llama 3 Baseten Baseten 128000 $3.62 74.9
Llama 3 Baseten Chat Baseten 200000 $3.55 73.2
Qwen3-Max Mini Alibaba Cloud 128000 $11.13 76.5
Reka Flash Reasoning Reka AI 32768 $10.70 75.6
Fusion Reasoning OpenRouter 65536 $8.59 72.2
Gemini 3 Flash Mini Google DeepMind 200000 $10.71 76.0
Gemma 3 Chat Google DeepMind 65536 $3.74 74.5

Other benchmarks for Fusion Reasoning

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 73.3 365 39th
GPQA Diamond 67.4 323 46th
SWE-bench Verified 61.7 288 52th
HumanEval 78.2 285 53th
MATH-500 73.1 356 41th
AIME 2025 63.3 364 39th
LiveCodeBench 66.6 259 57th
IFEval 82.0 278 54th
TruthfulQA 73.8 358 40th
MMMU 71.0 272 55th
Arena Elo 1357.6 348 42th

FAQ

What score does Fusion Reasoning get on HellaSwag?

Fusion Reasoning scores 84.1 on HellaSwag in this index. The benchmark average is 81.4 and the top score is 96.1.

How does Fusion Reasoning rank on HellaSwag?

It ranks #274 of 600 models, in the 54th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.1.

Is Fusion Reasoning good at HellaSwag?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the HellaSwag score calculated?

HellaSwag is a commonsense benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Fusion Reasoning cost?

Fusion Reasoning costs $8.59 per million input tokens and $32.34 per million output tokens.

Related