Gemini 2.5 Pro Vision on HumanEval: score, rank and what it means
Gemini 2.5 Pro Vision scores 85.8 on HumanEval, placing it #102 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.
Score distribution
The chart shows the top 10 models on HumanEval, with Gemini 2.5 Pro Vision highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.
Top 10 leaderboard
| # | Model | Provider | Context | Input / 1M | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5.2 Pro | OpenAI | 2000000 | $21.32 | 89.6 |
| 2 | Gemini 3 Pro Pro | Google DeepMind | 200000 | $19.80 | 87.3 |
| 3 | o4 Max | OpenAI | 2000000 | $19.51 | 86.2 |
| 4 | Grok 4 Reasoning | xAI | 2000000 | $19.67 | 87.8 |
| 5 | Claude Opus 4.5 | Anthropic | 400000 | $19.42 | 87.7 |
| 6 | GPT-5.2 Max | OpenAI | 1000000 | $21.39 | 89.2 |
| 7 | Claude Opus 4.5 Pro | Anthropic | 200000 | $20.98 | 89.1 |
| 8 | Grok 4 Max | xAI | 2000000 | $19.70 | 86.6 |
| 9 | GPT-5.2 Turbo | OpenAI | 1000000 | $20.73 | 87.4 |
| 10 | GPT-5.1 Reasoning | OpenAI | 400000 | $20.27 | 88.3 |
What this score means
On HumanEval, Gemini 2.5 Pro Vision sits at #102 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 96.8, so the gap to the top is 11.0 points. The median model in this index scores 77.4, which puts Gemini 2.5 Pro Vision above the midpoint.
Google DeepMind models average 82.4 on this benchmark. Gemini 2.5 Pro Vision is 3.4 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Google DeepMind model.
Among multimodal models, the average is 82.2. Gemini 2.5 Pro Vision is 3.6 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.
Read a 85.8 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.
Price context
At $14.91 per million input tokens, Gemini 2.5 Pro Vision is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HumanEval. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.
| Model | Provider | Context | Input / 1M | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERNIE 4.5 Turbo | Baidu | 128000 | $13.75 | 79.7 |
| GLM-4.6 Chat | Zhipu AI | 400000 | $4.89 | 79.8 |
| Gemini 3 Flash | Google DeepMind | 128000 | $15.67 | 83.6 |
| Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro | Anthropic | 1000000 | $15.07 | 80.8 |
| Gemini 2.5 Pro Vision | Google DeepMind | 200000 | $14.91 | 82.0 |
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Anthropic | 200000 | $14.91 | 81.6 |
| o3 Vision | OpenAI | 1000000 | $15.24 | 81.8 |
Other benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Vision
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Percentile | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 83.9 | 84 | 86th | |
| GPQA Diamond | 78.0 | 86 | 86th | |
| SWE-bench Verified | 72.4 | 71 | 88th | |
| MATH-500 | 82.9 | 147 | 76th | |
| AIME 2025 | 80.0 | 88 | 85th | |
| LiveCodeBench | 76.0 | 83 | 86th | |
| IFEval | 90.2 | 66 | 89th | |
| TruthfulQA | 84.1 | 82 | 86th | |
| HellaSwag | 90.8 | 66 | 89th | |
| MMMU | 78.2 | 91 | 85th | |
| Arena Elo | 1451.3 | 70 | 88th |
FAQ
What score does Gemini 2.5 Pro Vision get on HumanEval?
Gemini 2.5 Pro Vision scores 85.8 on HumanEval in this index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the top score is 96.8.
How does Gemini 2.5 Pro Vision rank on HumanEval?
It ranks #102 of 600 models, in the 83rd percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro Vision good at HumanEval?
Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.
How is the HumanEval score calculated?
HumanEval is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.
What does Gemini 2.5 Pro Vision cost?
Gemini 2.5 Pro Vision costs $14.91 per million input tokens and $71.00 per million output tokens.