Gemini 2.5 Pro Vision on MMLU-Pro: score, rank and what it means
Gemini 2.5 Pro Vision scores 83.9 on MMLU-Pro, placing it #84 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 73.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 91.6.
Score distribution
The chart shows the top 10 models on MMLU-Pro, with Gemini 2.5 Pro Vision highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.
Top 10 leaderboard
| # | Model | Provider | Context | Input / 1M | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5.2 Pro | OpenAI | 2000000 | $21.32 | 89.6 |
| 2 | GPT-5.1 Max | OpenAI | 2000000 | $20.50 | 87.9 |
| 3 | Claude Opus 4.5 Pro | Anthropic | 200000 | $20.98 | 89.1 |
| 4 | Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning | Anthropic | 2000000 | $20.91 | 88.2 |
| 5 | Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning | Google DeepMind | 200000 | $19.69 | 87.5 |
| 6 | GPT-5.1 Reasoning | OpenAI | 400000 | $20.27 | 88.3 |
| 7 | GPT-5.2 | OpenAI | 2000000 | $19.71 | 88.0 |
| 8 | Claude Opus 4.5 Max | Anthropic | 1000000 | $20.90 | 87.8 |
| 9 | GPT-5.2 Vision | OpenAI | 1000000 | $19.03 | 87.4 |
| 10 | Gemini 3 Pro Max | Google DeepMind | 2000000 | $20.57 | 87.9 |
What this score means
On MMLU-Pro, Gemini 2.5 Pro Vision sits at #84 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 91.6, so the gap to the top is 7.7 points. The median model in this index scores 76.1, which puts Gemini 2.5 Pro Vision above the midpoint.
Google DeepMind models average 80.4 on this benchmark. Gemini 2.5 Pro Vision is 3.5 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Google DeepMind model.
Among multimodal models, the average is 80.0. Gemini 2.5 Pro Vision is 3.9 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.
Read a 83.9 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.
Price context
At $14.91 per million input tokens, Gemini 2.5 Pro Vision is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMLU-Pro. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.
| Model | Provider | Context | Input / 1M | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERNIE 4.5 Turbo | Baidu | 128000 | $13.75 | 79.7 |
| GLM-4.6 | Zhipu AI | 128000 | $5.10 | 80.2 |
| GPT-4.1 Vision | OpenAI | 1000000 | $14.88 | 82.0 |
| Qwen3-Max | Alibaba Cloud | 400000 | $17.37 | 84.4 |
| Gemini 2.5 Pro Vision | Google DeepMind | 200000 | $14.91 | 82.0 |
| DeepSeek-R1 | DeepSeek | 128000 | $5.83 | 82.8 |
| ERNIE 4.5 | Baidu | 65536 | $13.44 | 80.0 |
Other benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Vision
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Percentile | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 78.0 | 86 | 86th | |
| SWE-bench Verified | 72.4 | 71 | 88th | |
| HumanEval | 85.8 | 102 | 83th | |
| MATH-500 | 82.9 | 147 | 76th | |
| AIME 2025 | 80.0 | 88 | 85th | |
| LiveCodeBench | 76.0 | 83 | 86th | |
| IFEval | 90.2 | 66 | 89th | |
| TruthfulQA | 84.1 | 82 | 86th | |
| HellaSwag | 90.8 | 66 | 89th | |
| MMMU | 78.2 | 91 | 85th | |
| Arena Elo | 1451.3 | 70 | 88th |
FAQ
What score does Gemini 2.5 Pro Vision get on MMLU-Pro?
Gemini 2.5 Pro Vision scores 83.9 on MMLU-Pro in this index. The benchmark average is 73.5 and the top score is 91.6.
How does Gemini 2.5 Pro Vision rank on MMLU-Pro?
It ranks #84 of 600 models, in the 86th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 91.6.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro Vision good at MMLU-Pro?
Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.
How is the MMLU-Pro score calculated?
MMLU-Pro is a knowledge benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.
What does Gemini 2.5 Pro Vision cost?
Gemini 2.5 Pro Vision costs $14.91 per million input tokens and $71.00 per million output tokens.